Hi James, With such numbers, does the ETL connect in remote or does it use the "plocal" embedded connection?
Best Regards, Luca Garulli Founder & CEO OrientDB <http://orientdb.com/> On 10 September 2015 at 11:51, James Wang <[email protected]> wrote: > I managed to import 25000 records per second using a stand alone OrientDB > server and OrientDB ETL. > > My total records were 20m - far far less than your 200 billions > > Not sure if any database can achieve that speed - may be able on a RAM > disk (but a RAM disk can not hold that much data though). > > > On Thursday, 10 September 2015 09:37:07 UTC+1, Razvan T wrote: >> >> Hello! >> >> I need to store a maximum of 200 billion records, each having 2 fields: >> A, and B, both strings of no more than 255 characters. >> I'll be inserting records into this database at a pace of about 50 000 >> per second. >> About once a second, I'll also be querying the database. All the queries >> will be the same: I'll need all the records where the field A=X, for a >> given X string. >> >> 1. Is it possible to use OrientDB to store such a database? >> 2. What kind of hardware would I need to store it? >> >> Thanks, >> > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "OrientDB" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OrientDB" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
