Thank you very much, in case you want to track the resolution of this
problem, you can watch this:
https://github.com/orientechnologies/orientdb/issues/new

Thanks

Luigi

2017-11-14 20:30 GMT+01:00 Eric24 <[email protected]>:

> Steps to produce bug:
>
>    1. Enable Lightweight Edges
>    2. CREATE CLASS SimpleV EXTENDS V
>    3. CREATE CLASS SimpleE EXTENDS E
>    4. INSERT INTO SimpleV CONTENT {"name":"A"}  // this is #25:0
>    5. INSERT INTO SimpleV CONTENT {"name":"B"}  // this is #25:1
>    6. CREATE EDGE SimpleE FROM #25:0 TO #25:1
>    7. SELECT FROM SimpleE  // empty result, provides that Lightweight
>    Edge was used
>    8. DELETE VERTEX #25:1
>    9. SELECT FROM SimpleV  // returns #25:0, with OUT still showing link
>    to #25:1
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, November 14, 2017 at 2:18:36 AM UTC-6, Luigi Dell'Aquila wrote:
>>
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> The main problem with lightweight edges is that they do not have an
>> identity, so they don't "physically" exist.
>> The big disadvantages are that:
>> - you cannot point to a single lightweight edge by RID
>> - you cannot count them, eg. SELECT FROM E will return a wrong result
>>
>> The DELETE VERTEX is supposed to work fine though, if you have a test
>> case that proves the problem please submit it, I'll check it asap
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Luigi
>>
>>
>> 2017-11-13 19:21 GMT+01:00 Eric24 <[email protected]>:
>>
>>> It has been mentioned many times that using lightweight edges is "more
>>> difficult" with SQL. Can anyone provide specific examples of when this is
>>> true (i.e. what are the SQL issues created by using them)?
>>>
>>> I ask because just about everything I've tried with lightweight edges
>>> works the same way with regular edges (even SELECTs that return linked
>>> records using both kinds of edges in a single query).
>>>
>>> The one thing I've found that doesn't work with lightweight edges (which
>>> is a bit of a surprise to me) is that the links are not "cleaned up" when
>>> doing a DELETE VERTEX operation (i.e. "broken" links are left in the
>>> remaining vertex records). Is this an expected behavior? If so, it should
>>> probably be listed in the documentation as one of the cons to lightweight
>>> edges. If not, what is the appropriate way to delete a vertex record while
>>> ensuring that links to the deleted record are removed from the remaining
>>> records?
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "OrientDB" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>> --
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "OrientDB" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OrientDB" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to