I completely agree with Viviane. I think Wikipedia can be gradually expanded with different contributions. The first contributions might not be entirely accurate, or better contributions might be offered later, but for me, the important thing is to start. Perhaps one way to do this is with short biographies of authors, folders, or creators, both current and deceased, but of whom we fortunately have fond memories and documentation. We also have experts in the history of origami in various associations, both from local history and from other countries, and we could ask them to contribute. Even the recently created website, Everything Origami, could be managed by someone or a team to handle these contributions. Best regards Manuel Sirgo
> El 14 mar 2026, a las 23:21, KDianne Stephens via Origami > <[email protected]> escribió: > > Viviane said This was my little idea of the day. (Wikipedia) > Wonderful idea, and long overdue > Orifun to all > Dianne > > -----Original Message----- > From: Origami [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Viviane Berty via Origami > Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2026 2:43 PM > To: The Origami Mailing List > Subject: [Origami] Wikipedia origami update > > Dear origami Friends, > > Forgive my stupid question : does anyone know why there is so few > Information on Wikipedia about origami ? With the aim of spreading the > origami knowledge, is there a team working to to add a complete and > reliable information into the largest encyclopedia ever ? How wonderful > it would be to contribute to the general art culture, don't you think ? > > I have heard that Wikipedia is no AI, is free, and it works > democratically, is it true ? > > I am terrible at computers things... (Moreover my English style is so > ugly... ! I do apologize.) > > This was my little idea of the day. > > Yours, > > Viviane. > >
