I had the same error message with 0.9.2, my ejb-jar.xml started with a
<?xml ...> after removing this line the message was gone.
Gal Shachor
On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Mike Fontenot wrote:
> The last version to work with my app was orion 9.1q. When I first started
> using 9.1q I get the following error when trying to communicate with a EJB
> from a client:
>
> Communication error: ejb-ref-type tag is missing from ejb-ref tag
> 'ProductCatalogEJBApplicationS
> tartupBean'
>
> Adding a line in the application-client.xml like:
> <ejb-ref-type>Session</ejb-ref-type> for all
> my current beans fixed this.
>
> Now, using 9.2 I get this error when starting the server:
>
> Error loading package at file:/F:/PolygonJava/, Error parsing
> META-INF/ejb-jar.xml in F:\Polygon
> Java: Fatal error at line 1 offset 3: Processing instruction name expected.
>
> I'm not sure what this is. Also, where was a problem with the server.xml
> file related to the 'development flag'. <development="true" /> does not
> seem to work anymore so I commented it out for the time being.
>
> Anyone have any ideas about how to fix this?
>
> Mike
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Karl Avedal
> > Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2000 11:31 AM
> > To: Orion-Interest
> > Cc: Orion-Interest
> > Subject: Re: ejb-config - HELP!
> >
> >
> > Hello David,
> >
> > We are sorry that the documentation is not of the standard we all
> > want. All I can
> > say is that we are constantly working on making more tutorials,
> > how-to:s and
> > other documentation and one day we will get there.
> >
> > What documentation would you want to see most? What parts of the
> > server do you
> > want more documentation about? There is alot to be done, this is still
> > "on-the-edge" software and the documentation is not complete.
> > What adds to the
> > complexity is also the fact that other J2EE documentation is very
> > limited. Alot
> > of things should be able to find out about in standard J2EE
> > documentation, books,
> > course, etc. but unfortunately, all that doesn't exist yet.
> >
> > Btw, You also say that you get what you pay for. Have you found
> > any other J2EE
> > servers with better documentation? Would be interesting for us to
> > see their
> > approach.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Karl Avedal
> >
> > David Sierra Fernandez wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > But solving this is only a small spot in a big mountain of sand.
> > > Orion is very poor documented and it is getting me continuously into
> > > troubles. I think i gonna get fed up with it in few days. It's
> > a pity that
> > > a powerfull software lose clients 'cause his "no" documentation or help.
> > > It's very clear, you get what you pay.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
