I didn't actually know about the JavaWorld article when I wrote it;
otherwise, I might not have bothered reinventing that wheel :-) For
anyone who hasn't read it, the article is at
http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-05-2000/f_jw-0526-testinfect.html.
I ran across a link to it at the Portland Pattern Repository's
EjbUnitTest site ( http://www.c2.com/cgi/wiki?EjbUnitTest).
I wrote mine more or less from scratch, although the concept is pretty
much identical. My implementation addresses the classloader problem
(who wants to reload their app server between tests?), and the output is
a lot more attractive :-) I would also like to enhance it with any
features that anyone thinks might be useful for unit testing EJBs, so
I'm open to any suggestions!
Later,
Jeff Schnitzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-----Original Message-----
From: Magnus Rydin
Sent: Fri 9/29/2000 2:46 AM
To: Orion-Interest
Cc:
Subject: RE: JUnit with Orion, source included
Jeff,
is this an implementation according to the article on JavaWorld
or a custom one?
An extremely good initiative :)
WR
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Schnitzer [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: den 28 september 2000 20:08
> To: Orion-Interest
> Subject: JUnit with Orion, source included
>
>
> I wrote an extension to JUnit for testing EJB/server-side code
that I
> think others might find useful. I've recently been bitten by
> the XP bug
> so this is the first thing I had to do :-) Basically it's a
servlet
> that will execute test cases and spit back the results as
HTML.
>
> It includes a small Ant buildfile for anyone that is
interested.
>
> You can find it at http://www.infohazard.org/junitee
> < http://www.infohazard.org/junitee>
>
> Enjoy :-)
>
> Jeff Schnitzer
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] < mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I apologize if anyone is receiving this twice. It looks like
the
> mailing list, including the archive, was sporadically losing
> traffic for
> a day or two. The most recent message in the archive is dated
three
> days ago. Anyone know what's up? I seem to be receiving
traffic fine
> at the moment.
>
winmail.dat
