Not to harm Orion I'm getting Out of memory twice a day. But I believe this
is my fault, not Orion's.
Btw, guys, this thread becomes more and more off the topic.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2000 11:14 AM
> To: Orion-Interest
> Subject: SV: Using Orion As a Plugin to IIS for Servlets/JSPs
>
>
> I have runned a full dynamic site with ASP, and it needed restart
> every week
> or it would crash because of an out of memory error, + if you look on the
> old benchmarks from the orion team you see that dynamic
> performance degrade
> over time with IIS 4.0, im not to confident about the IIS 5.0...
>
> Yes IIS is fast providing you use only static content, but when you use
> dynamic content, you get problems, and the reason IIS is fast for static
> content is because they hooked the server into the kernel of windows
> (smart). Same thing is coming to linux kernel pretty soon (the unstable
> versions have it allready)...
>
> But how many sites use static content. As long as i have been working, you
> will find maby 10% static content, and then dynamic performance
> is the thing
> that is important (and stability ofcourse).
>
> Klaus
>
> -----Opprinnelig melding-----
> Fra: Kyle Cordes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sendt: 4. oktober 2000 17:38
> Til: Orion-Interest
> Emne: Re: Using Orion As a Plugin to IIS for Servlets/JSPs
>
>
> > Ps: Orion is faster than IIS, so is most other webservers.. IIS
> is full of
> > memory leaks and other stuff that make it bend when the load is really
> hard,
> > and over time. Check the benchmarks on orion page, its done with
> microsofts
> > own benchmark utility so :)
>
> In my experiance, for serving static HTML, IIS provides high
> performance and
> reliability.  It also does very well with dynamic content
> provided by ISAPI
> DLLs.  Why do you believe it is "full of memory leaks"?
>
> The benchmark on the Orion web site rightfully points out that Orion JSPs
> are faster than IIS ASPs, which is mostly because JSPs are
> compiled (to Java
> code) while ASPs are interpreted.  (Note however that apparently ASPs will
> eventually be semi-compiled, boosting performance.)
>
> -Kyle Cordes
>
>
>
>
>


Reply via email to