I haven't tried linux jvm yet, but I would think because you can run linux
on a limited cheap setup very effectively and its resources are far less
than the Win2K (I wouldn't use WinNT..too many crashes), I would deploy to
linux over Win2K. However, I think for most things Win2K is easier to setup
(at least for now) than linux. I think the GUI of linux is coming along
nicely though.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russ White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 6:26 AM
> To: Orion-Interest
> Subject: RE: Orion in production
>
>
> Indeed with most JVM version the NT/W2K version will be
> faster than Linux. But
> now that the 1.3 versions from Sun & IBM are out this is no
> longer true. I now
> almost exclusively deploy to Linux.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Holmes, George
> > (TWIi London)
> > Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 6:00 AM
> > To: Orion-Interest
> > Subject: RE: Orion in production
> >
> >
> > I wasn't working on the project myself, and possibly gave a slightly
> > mis-leading impression ;->
> >
> > To the best of my knowledge there were 8-12 Dual P3 500,
> each loaded with
> > all the necessary EJBs, JSPs et al. and load-balanced using
> BIG IP from F5
> > Networks. However, none of the boxes were even touched in
> terms of resource
> > consumption.
> >
> > Apparently, and this is a definite (sic) Windows NT 4/2000 with a
> > dual-processor running Java out-performs a Linux box of the
> same spec
> > running Java. Originally, the project was trialled to run
> on Linux, but it
> > was discovered that NT 4 was faster!!! Has anyone else had
> any experience
> > of this? I was told that it was due to better MP support
> in NT 4/2000???
> >
> > George
> >
> > GEORGE HOLMES
> >
> > TWI Interactive
> > Media House
> > Burlington Lane
> > LONDON
> > W4 2TH
> > ENGLAND
> >
> > TEL: +44 208 233 5631
> > FAX: +44 208 233 7701
> > CELL: +44 7968 918813
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Duffey, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 20 October 2000 19:24
> > To: Orion-Interest
> > Subject: RE: Orion in production
> >
> >
> > Wow! That's pretty impressive results. What sort of hardware are you
> > running?
> >
> > As my performance test showed, on a single PIII650 I was
> able to generate on
> > average about 4.5million page hits a day (on a simple login process
> > anyways).
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Holmes, George (TWIi London) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 1:14 AM
> > > To: Orion-Interest
> > > Subject: RE: Orion in production
> > >
> > >
> > > www.opengolf.com
> > >
> > > This is the official web site for the British Open Golf
> > > tournament. Did 30
> > > million page impressions/day (ish) for the four days of the Open.
> > >
> > > George
> > >
> > > GEORGE HOLMES
> > >
> > > TWI Interactive
> > > Media House
> > > Burlington Lane
> > > LONDON
> > > W4 2TH
> > > ENGLAND
> > >
> > > TEL: +44 208 233 5631
> > > FAX: +44 208 233 7701
> > > CELL: +44 7968 918813
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Juan Lorandi (Chile) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: 19 October 2000 22:13
> > > To: Orion-Interest
> > > Subject: Orion in production
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > I have been using orion for about 6 months now, and now, as
> > > I'm finishing my
> > > app, I need to sell orion to my customers...
> > > For this, it would be *VERY* valuable to have a list of
> sites (on the
> > > internet or intranets) which use orion...
> > >
> > > So, basically, what I have in mind is that anybody on this
> > > list that wishes
> > > to report a site as being partiallly/fully powered by orion,
> > > report it to my email address, [EMAIL PROTECTED], so that I
> > > can make a list
> > > of these, to publish it on WWW
> > >
> > > I think this will prove useful for us all.
> > >
> > > TIA,
> > >
> > > JP
> > >
> >
> >
>
