If you have tried to solve it and can not, go ahead and file a bug report 
on it. The Orion team members have pointed out that they frequently don't 
read every message on this list and the preferred method of communication 
in a case like this is Bugzilla.

Good luck!

Jim


--On Monday, October 30, 2000 11:55 AM -0500 Vidur Dhanda 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Well, that's good (in a bad way).  At least I'm not the only one to have
> experienced this.  Unfortunately, I can't use message-driven beans
> (restricted to EJB1.1, for now).
>
> Memo to Orion team: could you please respond to this.  I've sent email to
> support regarding this.  I'm hesitant to file this as a bug report since I
> haven't verified that it isn't a problem with my approach/configuration.
>
> Vidur
>
> Arved Sandstrom wrote:
>
>> Funny you should bring this up. I wanted a JMS listener as a "service",
>> and in order to keep it more compliant with most app servers, the first
>> thing I tried was exactly what you describe, with the same results.
>>
>> Eventually I went with a message-driven bean, even if that only avoided
>> the problem.
>>
>> Arved Sandstrom
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Vidur Dhanda
>> Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2000 4:46 PM
>> To: Orion-Interest
>> Subject: Using JMS with auto-started client
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> In my application.xml I have a <module> block and in
>> orion-application.xml  I have a <client-module> block with
>> auto-start=true.  This correctly starts up some application code along
>> with the orion server.  One of the classes that are started, subscribes
>> to a JMS queue.  It is able to get a connection factory, create a
>> subscriber etc. but _never_ gets any messages.  When I run the same
>> class from the command-line and not have orion auto-start it, it gets
>> messages fine.  Actually, I'm rather impressed with the speed with which
>> messages are delivered.
>>
>> How do I understand this further? Since the code runs fine when not
>> auto-started and when auto-started it doesn't throw any exceptions, I'm
>> assuming this is a problem with my configuration.  Can anyone help me
>> with fix it, please.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Vidur
>





Reply via email to