At 10:11 AM 11/15/2000 +0100, you wrote: >At 14:48 14.11.00 , you wrote: > >>Thanks Robert. I think I'll try running some >>benchmarks this week and post the results. I wonder.. >>is there a way for and EJB->EJB to be _forced_ to >>go through RMI? i.e. can I turn this optimization >>off? > >I don't think there is a documented way to to this. Not to be a jerk but to provide some constructive criticism to Orion ... I don't think there is a documented way to do many, many things. Considering that it is a closed-source product, I think documentation should be one of the most important things to accompany the actual binaries.
- Re: EJB Performance Question. Klaus Thiele
- RE: EJB Performance Question. Juan Lorandi (Chile)
- RE: EJB Performance Question. Tim Drury
- RE: EJB Performance Question. Robert Krueger
- Re: EJB Performance Question. 김철회
- RE: EJB Performance Question. Tim Drury
- RE: EJB Performance Question. Robert Krueger
- RE: EJB Performance Question. Mike Clark
- RE: EJB Performance Question. Tim Drury
- RE: EJB Performance Question. Robert Krueger
- RE: EJB Performance Question. Gerald Gutierrez
- RE: EJB Performance Question. Tim Drury
- EJB using "core" classes? Kevin Duffey
- Re: EJB using "core" classes? Robert Krueger
- Re: EJB using "core" class... Gerald Gutierrez
