At 11:12 24.11.00 , you wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'd like to know, is anyone currently using Orion in a production 
>environment? The rather high number of issues people report here bothers 
>me because I'd like to get serious with a particular EJB server and my 
>opinion was that Orion was the right choice because of it's low cost and 
>features.
>In addition, I'd like to know if Orion's HTTP server is suitable for 
>production work, I really would like to have a unified environment instead 
>of having a separate web server for my JSPs and servlets.

yes, we've been using it for the past 6 months in production (mainly 
content management and ecommerce) with over 10 different j2ee applications 
extensively using servlets, ejb (lots of cmp) so I think I can say that I 
know what I'm talking about. it's a two-edged sword. as you mention, the 
integration of having one consistent all-java j2ee environment is of great 
value and orion's deployment concept is very logical and well-designed. 
however there are some serious issues with a number of parts of the server 
(check the archives for JMS and a number of issues regarding 
exclusive-write-access settings as examples) some of which have brought us 
in very awkward situations, many times having to work around them with a 
lot of effort. I would say that in some areas orion is production ready, in 
some it's not well-tested at all. do extensive testing and if every feature 
you use works, buy it. it's a great deal for the price. however, there is a 
substantial risk involved that you may run into a serious bug in a 
situation when you least need it and then you might be helpless with no 
source and maybe no fix available for a few weeks/months (been there). I'm 
not saying this to bash evermind (I sympathize a lot with them actually) 
but I'm simply speaking from experience to help other people make an 
informed decision as I would expect them to do if I asked about a product I 
don't know yet.

my personal opinion on this is that evermind should deliver source (while 
retaining full rights on enhancements and bug fixes) with the product to 
eliminate that risk. other commercial projects like orbaccus 
(http://www.ooc.com) have shown that they still make a lot of money despite 
shipping source for more than five years now. I'm sure about 80% of the 
bugs our team has reported would have been fixed by us immediately or at 
least would have been accurately described to the line of source code that 
has to be changed.

I've brought this up to karl and magnus but they don't want to do this and 
it simply is their baby and therefore their decision (they probably think 
I'm either a parrot or insane, repeating the same stuff over and over again 
;-).

It's only for that (having been helpless in many situations when we least 
neded it), that we are seriously considering moving to jboss as soon as 
their cmp support has met a certain level of quality, although their server 
is inferior to orion in many regards, especially as far as the overall 
integration is concerned. BUT their main architects/developers take the 
time to answer user questions on their user list every day and if there is 
a small bug (one or two line fix typically) you can just make it and submit 
it instead of spending 10 times as much effort assembling a test case to 
submit it to the developers. Don't get me wrong. I'm not talking of 
open-sourcing the project in the sense that I want to tell them how to 
develop the server because they are best at it. It's all about fixing (many 
times silly) bugs which can make your life hell if a project deadline is 
approaching and you simply cannot do anything about it and a workaround 
involves a lot of effort.

I very much hope the situation with orion will improve because it's great 
product with no equivalent in functionality/price ratio at the moment.

any other orion users have an opion on that?

regards,

robert


>Regards,
>
>Paul
>___________________________________________________________________________ 
>__________
>Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com
>
>

(-) Robert Kr�ger
(-) SIGNAL 7 Gesellschaft f�r Informationstechnologie mbH
(-) Br�der-Knau�-Str. 79 - 64285 Darmstadt,
(-) Tel: 06151 665401, Fax: 06151 665373
(-) [EMAIL PROTECTED], www.signal7.de


Reply via email to