Actually there is nothing in the spec mandating a single instance. You could have multiple instances of the same entity bean (representing the same persistent store) as long as their access to the store was synchronized and changes are reflected accross all the beans. Al -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gary Shea Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 8:46 PM To: Orion-Interest Subject: RE: Session EJB Accessibility I could use a little help here. My limited understanding of entity beans suggests that if I create an EB using a particular key value, as long as I refer only to that same key value there would only be one instance of the EB.
- Re: Session EJB Accessibility Mark Bernardinis
- Re: Session EJB Accessibility Gary Shea
- RE: Session EJB Accessibility Allen Fogleson
- cascade-delete support Christian Billen
- RE: Session EJB Accessibility Juan Lorandi (Chile)
- RE: Session EJB Accessibility Juan Lorandi (Chile)
- RE: Session EJB Accessibility Luong, Tony S322
- RE: Session EJB Accessibility Juan Lorandi (Chile)
- RE: Session EJB Accessibility Jeff Schnitzer
- RE: Session EJB Accessibility Gary Shea
- Factoring EJB Homes from within Session EJB Allen Fogleson
- Factoring EJB Homes from within Session... Christian Billen
- Re: Factoring EJB Homes from within... Thomas Hertz
- Re: Factoring EJB Homes from w... Nick Newman
- RE: Session EJB Accessibility Mark Bernardinis
- RE: Session EJB Accessibility Mark Bernardinis
- RE: Session EJB Accessibility Jeff Schnitzer
- Re: Session EJB Accessibility Vidur Dhanda
- Re: Session EJB Accessibility Dan Winfield
- Re: Session EJB Accessibility Christian Sell
- 1.4.7 ejb1.1 entity problem. Russ White
