One more thing,
currently, you need to add the object on each end of the bidirectional 1-n relation.
Finders are automatically generated for simple expressions, such as
findByCustomer, findbyId etc
but does not handle
findByCustomerAndId
etc.
And Im happy that more time is *not* spent on handling findByThisAndThat etc, as atleast I gonna rely on EJB QL as soon as its implemented.
WR
> -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> Fr�n: Jeff Schnitzer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Skickat: den 21 februari 2001 13:55
> Till: Orion-Interest
> �mne: RE: EJB 2.0 CMP features of Orion
>
>
> Unidirectional 1-1 and 1-n relationships between EJBs work, but
> bidirectional relationships do not. There are easy ways to fake it,
> though.
>
> It's not strictly according to the specification - with
> Orion, you must
> define the CMR fields as <cmp-field>s in the <entity>. pd2
> and pdf say
> you shouldn't. This may have been a change going from pd1 to
> pd2; most
> of the CMR (and DO) stuff is based on pd1. I can't fault the
> Orion team
> for not keeping up with every zigzag (there have been several).
>
> Another thing I noticed is that (at least in 1.4.5) primitive EJB-QL
> seems to work. When I create a simple findByField method,
> Orion figures
> out how to create the appropriate finder-method in orion-ejb-jar.xml.
>
> Jeff
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Randahl Fink Isaksen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 4:48 AM
> >To: Orion-Interest
> >Subject: EJB 2.0 CMP features of Orion
> >
> >
> >Has anyone tried out OR-mapping of 1-1 relationships and 1-n
> >relationships
> >between two EJBs? I have seen Jim Archer's fine tutorial about
> >EJBs having a
> >1-1 or 1-n relationship to a *dependent object*, but is the
> same thing
> >possible between two EJBs?
> >I know the web site states that Orion 1.2.9 does NOT support n-m
> >relationships, but is 1-1 or 1-n supported in the latest
> >release, and is the
> >support for 1-1 and 1-n in accordance with the specification?
> >
> >Randahl
> >
> >
> >
>
