A better alternative is to use Cloudscape instead of Access.
See Orion's support page for setting this up or search the maillist for  cloudscape.
It is simple to use and download is free for development.
 
Also, you will be able to use a type 4 JDBC driver which will be much faster than your jdbc-odbc bridge.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bernard Briggs
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:11 PM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: Orion and MS Access for Demonstration

I've seen two problems that exist with using Orion/EJBs with MS Access.   We're trying to use Access for a small pilot as it is easy to move around.
 
 
1)  MS Access or JDBC-ODBC bridge doesn't support the primitive type long
 
2) MS Access or JDBC-ODBC bridge has a low limit on the size of it's "records"
 
 
For the lack of long support, I map longs to ints.
 
For the size issue, I map String types to char(128) instead of the default char(256)
 
My question:
 
Does anyone know of a more "elegant" way to use Access and get around these limitations?  I'd rather not have to tiptoe around these issues in the way described here if there is a better alternative.
 
 
 

Reply via email to