Are you using 1.5.3?
We noticed this prior to releasing 1.5.3 and fixed it, I was under the
impression that this worked fine?
WR

> -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> Fr�n: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]F�r Lachezar Dobrev
> Skickat: den 20 november 2001 11:30
> Till: Orion-Interest
> �mne: A word of warning: SwiftMQ and Resource providers.
>
>
>    Recently looking at the Resource-Providers docs, and EAGER to use an
> external JMS for my MDBs I and a colleague decided to run the demos.
>    As quite a surprise the demo run ok. The MDB did everything when a
> message was sent to the Queue.
>
>    The BIG disappointment was, when we tried to do the same with
> the topic.
>    In short: It does not work.
>    It seems, that Orion is looking for the resource type.
> Although it should
> check if the resource is of the NEEDED type, it rather checks if the
> resource is of ANY type.
>    SwiftMQ implements a Topic as a subclass of it's Queue implementation:
>
>    the plainsocket@router1 class is as follows:
>
> class com.swiftmq.jms.ConnectionFactoryImpl
>   |-> interface javax.jms.QueueConnectionFactory
>   |-> interface javax.jms.TopicConnectionFactory
>   '-> interface java.io.Serializable
>
>    the testqueue@router1 class is as follows:
>
> class com.swiftmq.jms.QueueImpl
>   |-> interface javax.jms.Queue
>   |-> interface java.io.Serializable
>   '-> interface com.swiftmq.jms.DestinationImpl
>
>    the testtopic class is as follows:
>
> class com.swiftmq.jms.TopicImpl
> | '-> interface javax.jms.Topic
> |
> '-> (super) class com.swiftmq.jms.QueueImpl
>               |-> interface javax.jms.Queue
>               |-> interface java.io.Serializable
>               '-> interface com.swiftmq.jms.DestinationImpl
>
>
>    As you can see a Topic is also a Queue.
>    So when trying to deploy the MDB one gets:
>
> Error deploying
> file:/D:/Temp/Orion/applications/Orion2SwiftMQ/Orion2SwiftMQ.jar
> homes: JMS
> Error: Queue 'testtopic' is not local! Can't create a Consumer on it!
>
>
>    But... That doesn't help. I'm quite disappointed. I almost got it.
>
>    Lachezar.
>


Reply via email to