Hi Russ,

What exactly do you mean by "stored/retrieved"? Is there a reference in
the spec you can point out?

Cheers

Geoff


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Russ White
Sent: Monday, 18 February 2002 11:47 AM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: RE: fyi: 1.5.4 still stacks rather than queues JMS messages


Yes, they should be received in order, but not necessarily
stored/retrieved in order.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Geoff Soutter
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 5:18 PM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: RE: fyi: 1.5.4 still stacks rather than queues JMS messages


Hi Mike,

I didn't see that comment. Unfortunately this list is so flakey that I
only get about 75% of the messages.

I just checked the JMS 1.02 spec, here's what it has to say about
message order (in 4.4.10.1 Order of Message Receipt):

"JMS defines that messages sent by a session to a destination must be
received in the order in which they were sent (see Section 4.4.10.2,
"Order of Message Sends," for a few qualifications)."

So it seems that, contrary to what that someone said, message order _is_
important with JMS.

Cheers,

Geoff
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike
Cannon-Brookes
Sent: Saturday, 16 February 2002 8:43 AM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: Re: fyi: 1.5.4 still stacks rather than queues JMS messages


Geoff,

Also as someone said on this list just a few days ago - as per the JMS
spec there is no guarantee that your messages turn up in the sequence
you sent them.

Cheers,
Mike

Mike Cannon-Brookes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Atlassian :: www.atlassian.com
    Supporting YOUR world


On 16/2/02 12:55 AM, "Stephen Davidson" ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
penned the words:

> Geoff Soutter wrote:
>
>> Re the problem reported a couple weeks back by Jorge Jimenez and 
>> confirmed by myself, I tested 1.5.4 to see if they had fixed this 
>> problem, but it's still there. Just set max-instances to 1 and load 
>> up with a lot of messages, it works just like a stack. Doh.
>>
>> Maybe I'll have time to put this into Bugzilla next week...
>>
>> Is _everyone_ using a third party JMS with Orion?
>>
>> geoff
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> I am using the Orion JMS, but the way the code is set up, it does not 
> care about the order the messages arrived.  I had never noticed the 
> "Out of Order" issue, as it was not applicable.
>
> -Steve







Reply via email to