I thought that the timezone had nothing to do with Orion, too. But when I 
run the same code in a standalone application (i.e. not loading the class 
within Orion), I get a correct behaviour. And I'm using the same VM.

So, the standalone app yields a timezone w/ DST and a class within Orion 
yields a TZ wo/ DST.

Weird. Any idea ?

regards,

Pierre

At 09:47 23.04.2002 +1000, you wrote:
>ello,
>
>Timezone is implemented as part of JDK, has nothing to do with the
>application servers. I noticed that JDK1.3.0 had problems with timezone for
>Sydney (Sydney had special daylight saving in year 2000 due to Olympic). But
>JDK1.3.1 had fixed the problem.
>
>cheers
>romen
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Pierre Metrailler - shockfish /" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Orion-Interest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 8:02 PM
>Subject: timezone issue
>
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > i've encountered a weird problem regarding timezones :
> >
> > My system timezone is set to Europe/Zurich, GMT+2, since we are in DST.
> >
> > Running a standalone java application and querying TimeZone.getDefault()
> > returns the correct timezone, i.e. the one with the correct ID
> > "Europe/Zurich". The time is also correct.
> >
> > Querying TimeZone.getDefault() within Orion yields a timezone with ID
> > "Custom" ! The offset is almost correct, excepted that it doesnt support
> > the daylight saving. (GMT+1). (TimeZone.getDefault()).useDaylightTime()
> > returns false, which is incorrect. Hence, the time is 1 hour late.
> >
> > In short, Orion does not properly build the right timezone from the system
> > settings. Is there any way to address this problem ?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Pierre
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________
> > Pierre Metrailler, Software Engineer & System Administrator
> > S h o c k f i s h Ltd, Event Communication Systems
> > PSE C - Parc Scientifique, CH-1015 Lausanne EPFL
> > Switzerland
> >
> > public key http://shockfish.com/keys/pierre.asc
> >
> > "Enabling face-to-face communication."
> >
> >
> >


Reply via email to