Dear Stefan:
Thank you for your interesting comments. I can offer no new comment son
the technology you mention, but may add that most scholars would agree with
you that there are no frgs. Of Mark from Cave 7 (including 7Q5). In fact,
following recent discussions by Nebe, Puech, and Mauro, it now seems quite
certain that several of the 7Q fragments are in fact parts of 1 Enoch. For a
summary of research, see my article:
Peter W. Flint,
³ŒApocrypha,¹ Other Previously-Known Writings, and ŒPeudepigrapha¹ in the
Dead Sea Scrolls,² in P. Flint and J. VanderKam (eds.), The Dead Sea Scrolls
After Fifty Years: A Comprehensive Assessment (2 vols., Leiden: Brill, 1999)
2.24-66, esp. pp. 41-45.
With best wishes,
Peter Flint
_________________________
Peter W. Flint
Professor of Biblical Studies and
Director, the Dead Sea Scrolls Institute
Trinity Western University Tel. (604) 888-7511 x3117
7600 Glover Road Fax (604) 513-2094
Langley, BC V2Y 1Y1 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CANADA web: www.twu.ca
_________________________
On 09/12/2001 00:31, "Stefan Enste" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear list-members,
>
> last year I published a book dealing with the theory a papyrus-fragment
> from Qumran (7Q5) contains a part of the gospel of Mark. My result: It
> is impossible to identify this fragment with a part of the gospel of Mark.
> Some reasons forced me to deal again with this subject. I am very
> interested in comments from scientists on this subject (especially
> papyrologists):
> - What do you think about the suggested identification of 7Q5?
> - What do you think about the methods of the supporters of this
> identification?
> - Especially: What do you think about the technology used by supporters
> to confirm their theory ("konfokales Laser Raster Mikroskop"), is this
> technology really suited to examine fragments?
> Thanks a lot for your comments!
> Stefan Enste
>
> -----------------------------------------
> You can find my article in the "Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und
> Epigraphik" from 1999 following this link:
>
> http://www.stefan-enste.de/Theologie/ZPE-Artikel/zpe-artikel.html
>
> My book: Enste, Stefan: Kein Markustext in Qumran. Eine Untersuchung der
> These: Qumran-Fragment 7Q5 = Mk 6, 52 - 53. Freiburg Schweiz, Göttingen:
> 2000 (= Novum Testamentum et Orbis Antiquus, 45)
For private reply, e-mail to Peter Flint <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from Orion, e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
message: "unsubscribe Orion." Archives are on the Orion Web
site, http://orion.mscc.huji.ac.il.
(PLEASE REMOVE THIS TRAILER BEFORE REPLYING TO THE MESSAGE)
