On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 10:06 +0100, Lukas Zeller wrote: > On Oct 8, 2009, at 9:26 , Patrick Ohly wrote: > > I updated the "san" branch so that it is based on our "multilib" > > branch > > and thus the latest Synthesis code. Can this be merged soonish? > > Ok, done. > > I also merged moblin/unilib - there was a conflict in configure.in I > tried > to resolve but I'm not sure I got it right. Please have a look (in the > last > few lines of the file).
Arg, I forgot to push the updated "san" branch - sorry. Yes, the conflict resolution looks good, pretty much like I did it myself. > So please let me know when you think we can leave the multilib branches > behind and focus on unilib as the new master. For SyncEvolution 1.0 we definitely want to use that branch, so let's go for it. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ os-libsynthesis mailing list [email protected] http://lists.synthesis.ch/mailman/listinfo/os-libsynthesis
