Hi Patrick, On Feb 3, 2010, at 8:20 , Patrick Ohly wrote:
>> This would be reasonably easy to implement (I can do it if we agree >> that this would be a useful solution) and would allow quite structured >> rule trees without repeating common parts. > > I think it would be useful to have and if you could implement this, we'd > certainly appreciate the help. > > Conceptually it is similar to how I did compatibility hacks with CD > writers: implement certain workarounds and make each of them depend on > its own flag. Then when detecting a certain model, turn the right flags > on. This worked well. In this case, the meta rules that don't match any > particular device take the place of the flags. As an additional benefit, > workarounds can be triggered both for such general "flags" as well as > for specific models. Thanks for the approval of the concept, so then it's coding time for me :-) Best Regards, Lukas Zeller ([email protected]) - Synthesis AG, SyncML Solutions & Sustainable Software Concepts [email protected], http://www.synthesis.ch _______________________________________________ os-libsynthesis mailing list [email protected] http://lists.synthesis.ch/mailman/listinfo/os-libsynthesis
