On Fr, 2011-07-22 at 15:30 +0200, Lukas Zeller wrote: > Hello Patrick, > > thanks for the READ() script function! This is sure a useful extension of the > script toolset.
I'm still tempted to embed Python as scripting engine into libsynthesis (optional, of course). The main advantage would be that we get such generic operations like file read/write and string manipulations for free. But in the current situation adding a normal function certainly was easier :-) Next on my TODO list is a WRITE() function: it'll be the inverse operation for inlining data and will become useful once files can be attached to contacts in Evolution Data Server. > However, I'd like to mention in this context that the engine for a > long time contains a mechanism for the general problem with large > fields. I know, but it didn't seem usable here, as you said. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ os-libsynthesis mailing list [email protected] http://lists.synthesis.ch/mailman/listinfo/os-libsynthesis
