On Mon, 2014-05-12 at 15:37 +0200, Lukas Zeller wrote: > Hello Patrick, > > On 12.05.2014, at 12:55, Patrick Ohly <[email protected]> wrote: > > > What's the intended behavior of suppressempty for arrays? > > > > "suppressempty": This optional boolean value. can be set to true if > > this property must > > never be sent empty (without values). This is the case for most > > vCalendar fields, for example. > > > > The default seems to be suppressempty=no (judging from the "can be set > > to true"). When I have arrays with empty entries, will those be > > generated? > > It also depends on "minShow" and "fDontSendEmptyProperties", and also > on "mandatory", but basically empty array elements will generate a > property when "suppressempty" is not set. At least that's the > intention :-)
Thanks for pointing out "fDontSendEmptyProperties". I have that set, which is probably the reason why they don't get generated. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ os-libsynthesis mailing list [email protected] http://lists.synthesis.ch/mailman/listinfo/os-libsynthesis
