Koji Uno wrote: > Hi, > > In the discussion, there are two items, timing > and menas of merging. > > I am going to work as follows. Let me know comments. > > - The initial code is came from onnv-gate and is > periodically mergerd from onnv-gate by mercurial. > > - The first target is set to b111b, now. Because it is > a stable version. The next one is not set, yet. > > - The changesets of ARM are inserted into the series > of onnv ones. It is not the same as onnv ones, but > it is going to be syncronized. > > Thanks, > > Koji Uno Will we know when it will be a good time to integrate? Is that on anyone's long term plan?
- [osarm-dev] ARM port state of affairs Cyril Plisko
- [osarm-dev] ARM port state of affairs Koji Uno
- [osarm-dev] ARM port state of affairs Cyril Plisko
- [osarm-dev] ARM port state of affairs Koji Uno
- [osarm-dev] ARM port state of affairs Cyril Plisko
- [osarm-dev] ARM port state of affairs Koji Uno
- [osarm-dev] ARM port state of affairs Cyril Plisko
- [osarm-dev] ARM port state of affairs Che Kristo
- [osarm-dev] ARM port state of affairs Raquel and Bill
- [osarm-dev] ARM port state of affairs Koji Uno
- [osarm-dev] ARM port state of affairs Mark Martin
- [osarm-dev] ARM port state of affairs Koji Uno
- [osarm-dev] ARM port state of affairs Cyril Plisko
- [osarm-dev] ARM port state of affairs Koji Uno