Richard S. Hall wrote:
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
If the name stays as Oscar, then it is obviously a move.
We can change the name. This is strictly and OSGi container effort here
at the ASF where several people from Apache and elsewhere intend to
contribute. It will not only be Richard. Those from KnoplerFish are
also interested, maven, plexus, and Geronimo people like Alan have an
interest in contributing. Oscar is just a name we picked.
Secondly its not a move because the Oscar 2.0 source is not open
anywhere. Meaning from my understanding Richard has not committed the
code to ObjectWeb. Oscar 1.0 is at ObjectWeb.
If Alex had used any of the existing project proposals as a guide,
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/newproject.html
then our requirements for accepting new projects would have been
clearer from the start.
I am sorry, I don't know about that. I thought we did start with the
Harmony project proposal as a guide.
Yes we used the Harmony project as a starting template.
Alex
