On Friday 26 August 2005 07:19, Richard S. Hall wrote: > If we really want to > draw a distinction, we could use 'r4-bundles' and 'bundles' or the > original suggestion.
So the question is; Is it important?? I think it is probably not important at all initially, since the numbers will be small. But assuming that multiple implementations of the standard services defined in the specification, and dozens of "unrelated" bundles, it could make sense. However, other mechanisms could be employed and we can always adjust the strategy in respect to svn layout about this later. I am +/-0 on either way. I otherwise agrees with Richards reasoning around why "optional" is not a good name. Cheers Niclas
