On Monday 03 October 2005 19:08, Richard S. Hall wrote: > The > issue is not a blocker, it is just a spec compliance feature that needs > to eventually be implemented. I just want to be able to distinguish > between issues that are improvements vs. spec compliance improvements.
IMHO, I think we should consider "missing spec compliance" "blockers" for final releases. And since each issue can be marked for a target release, I think that is doable. Yes, I think "Type" is site-wide, but we can check with Infrastructure, since there are probably quite a few ASF projects by now that have official specs to worry about. Noel!, what do you think with your "root" hat on ? Cheers Niclas
