See the mails Dave and I exchanged a few minutes ago...

PM/DM was written with the assumption that update-rpms could not handle
multiple requests in a single invocation.  This is an incorrect
assumption.

I'll fix this, but it'll take me a day or three to do so (got some
deadlines today).  It should work fine (aside from the filter issue),
albiet slow.


On Mon, 10 May 2004, Neil Gorsuch wrote:

> I must be misunderstanding what was fixed. On a fresh RH9 vmware box
> with a fresh cvs update -d -P for the oscar tree, update-rpms is still
> showing up using many many minutes of time multiple times. What is being
> cached, or is it being cached at all? How can I tell?
>
> On Fri, 2004-05-07 at 16:23, Lombard, David N wrote:
>
> > A new update-rpms RPM is now in CVS, between a tweak to the setup script
> > to and some changes to update-rpms, I have eliminated the rebuild-cache
> > problem and also eliminated another 100 seconds (due to the above
> > mentioned tweak).
> >
> > I would note that there are many calls to update-rpms, which should be
> > replaceable with either one per uber-package or one total.  This would
> > save a boatload of time.
> >
> > ACTION REQUIRED: Note, there are two libaio RPMS in the base RH distro
> > that need to be removed in the same way the base distro PVM packages are
> > removed.
> >
> > Removing these RPMS gets me to the following error when trying to
> > install the server packages:
> >
> >   /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.16748: line 3: `switcher-reload': not a valid
> > identifier
> >   error: %post(lam-oscar-module-7.0-2) scriptlet failed, exit status 2
> >   /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.96393: line 3: `switcher-reload': not a valid
> > identifier
> >   error: %post(lam-with-gm-oscar-module-7.0-2) scriptlet failed, exit
> > status 2
> >   $pm->install ($dm->query_required_by ()) failed at ./install_server
> > line 63
> >   Couldn't install the required packages needed for OSCAR at
> > ./install_server line 63
> >   --> Step 3: Failed to properly install OSCAR server; please check the
> > logs
> >
> > I have not yet added the disk independence package until I can get to
> > building the client image and reloading a client.
> >
> > I've also tested the node sort routines in OSCAR 3.0, and will add those
> > once 3.1 is functional again.
>
>

-- 
{+} Jeff Squyres
{+} [EMAIL PROTECTED]
{+} http://www.lam-mpi.org/


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software
Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to deliver
higher performing products faster, at low TCO.
http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3
_______________________________________________
Oscar-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel

Reply via email to