Bugs item #981469, was opened at 2004-06-28 12:14
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by dnl
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=109368&aid=981469&group_id=9368

Category: Installation
Group: 4.0
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 7
Submitted By: Thomas Naughton (naughtont)
Assigned to: David N. Lombard (dnl)
Summary: step3 fails from DepMan/update-rpms 

Initial Comment:
The DepMan/update-rpm fails in "Step 3: Install OSCAR
Server Packages" at DepMan.pm:304.  This seems to be
from an update-rpms error (but none of that output is
printed).

Here's some debug print stmts w/ the cmdln options for
update-rpms.

--> Installing server non-core RPMs (core RPMs already
installed)
TJNDBG-command_helper:
  aggregatable=(1) command=(update-rpms) cl=(--check
--quiet --cachedir=/var/cache/update-rpms #args 2>&1)
success=()
DepMan: update-rpms failed:  at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/OSCAR/DepMan.pm line 30
7.
--> Step 3: Failed to properly install OSCAR server;
please check the logs


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: David N. Lombard (dnl)
Date: 2004-11-01 13:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=27334

Actual error: If a package is missing (e.g., due to
misspelling), don't get a reasonable error report.  Problem
exists in depman, packman, update-rpms comms.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Thomas Naughton (naughtont)
Date: 2004-10-27 08:17

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=288102

Dave's looking at the return code mgmt for DepMan (from
update-rpms) so you get logical error messages and handle
errors more gracefully.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Thomas Naughton (naughtont)
Date: 2004-06-28 14:49

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=288102

Assigning to you since this appears to actually be a LAM bug.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Thomas Naughton (naughtont)
Date: 2004-06-28 14:48

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=288102

After doing a bit more testing it appears that the return
code from update-rpms was non-zero in some cases.  I walked
over all PKGS individually and noticed the following pkg
rpms had non-zero rc's from update-rpms, all part of the LAM
package.  
    lam-oscar-module
    lam-gm-oscar
    lam-gm-oscar-module
    lam-switcher-modulefile

Looks like LAM's got some info in 'config.xml' that doesn't
match all filenames of lam/distro/*/*.rpm. 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] packages]$ egrep -e lam-gm -e module lam/config.xml 
    <rpm>lam-oscar-module</rpm>
    <rpm>lam-gm-oscar</rpm>
    <rpm>lam-gm-oscar-module</rpm>
    <rpm>lam-switcher-modulefile</rpm>

[EMAIL PROTECTED] packages]$ find lam/distro/|egrep -e lam-gm -e module
lam/distro/mdk90/lam-oscar-module-7.0-2.i586.rpm
lam/distro/mdk90/lam-with-gm-oscar-module-7.0-2.i586.rpm
lam/distro/rh80/lam-gm-oscar-7.0.6-1.i586.rpm
lam/distro/rh80/lam-gm-oscar-modulefile-7.0.6-1.i586.rpm
lam/distro/rh80/lam-oscar-modulefile-7.0.6-1.i586.rpm
lam/distro/rh80/lam-switcher-modulefile-7.0.6-1.noarch.rpm

So, i'm pretty sure if I exclude LAM thing will be ok for
Server portion of things, ie. there's no bug in
DepMan/update-rrpms...except that I had no idea what caused
the problem and had to edit the code to figure out what
caused the failure.  ;)

Party on!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=109368&aid=981469&group_id=9368


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click
_______________________________________________
Oscar-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel

Reply via email to