Hey Dave:

Well, the installation documentation do have a lot of 'distro-specific' 
release-notes, like RH9, FC2, Mandrake, etc....

Cheers,

Bernard 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lombard, David N [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 16:34
> To: Bernard Li; Thomas Naughton; Fernando Laudares Camargos
> Cc: OSCAR-DEVEL
> Subject: RE: [Oscar-devel] README.RHAS3.iA64 (final) and 
> elilo problems
> 
> To argue for a separate README.RHEL3.txt file, I would note 
> that there's a lot of stuff for RHEL3 (most of which is for 
> either IA32 or IA64), with no reason to clog up the normal 
> release notes.  A note in the release notes to also look at 
> this README is fair comment. 
> 
> The README.RHEL3.txt file still needs a wee bit of 
> wordsmithing; I'll post some comments 1st thing tomorrow morning.
> 
> --
> David N. Lombard
>  
> My comments represent my opinions, not those of Intel Corporation.
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:oscar-devel- 
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bernard Li
> >Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 6:28 PM
> >To: Thomas Naughton; Fernando Laudares Camargos
> >Cc: OSCAR-DEVEL
> >Subject: RE: [Oscar-devel] README.RHAS3.iA64 (final) and 
> elilo problems
> >
> >Okay I have just modified the file.  Basically I renamed it 
> so that it 
> >no longer has the ia64 in the filename and added the line wrap which 
> >Thomas suggested.
> >
> >If nobody objects, I will also modify the release-notes.tex 
> and simply 
> >wipe out the whole thing regard RHEL 3 and tell the user to read the 
> >README.RHAS3.txt file found in the source tarball.  In that case we 
> >only need to update one file.
> >
> >What do you guys think?
> >
> >Alternatively, I can copy the contents of README.RHAS3.txt to the 
> >release notes and simply delete that file from SVN.
> >
> >Cheers,
> >
> >Bernard
> >
> >P.S. How goes RHEL 3 testing on i386/Itanium?
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf 
> Of Thomas 
> >> Naughton
> >> Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 13:33
> >> To: Fernando Laudares Camargos
> >> Cc: OSCAR-DEVEL
> >> Subject: Re: [Oscar-devel] README.RHAS3.iA64 (final) and elilo 
> >> problems
> >>
> >> Hello all,
> >>
> >> Sorry to be a bit anal-retentive on this text but on the 
> long lines, 
> >> it might help to include the "\" (line wrap) character in the 
> >> examples since some users might type the commands literally.
> >>
> >> Just a suggestions,
> >> --tjn
> >>
> >> PS  Glad to see others notice these things too, i.e., <= 79 column 
> >> lines!
> >>
> >>
> >> ______________________________________________________________
> >> ___________
> >>    Thomas Naughton
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>    Research Associate                                   
> (865) 576-4184
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Fernando Laudares Camargos wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hello Bernard, David,
> >> >
> >> >       I formated the README.RHAS3.IA64 to a maximum of 79 column 
> >> > lines, renamed and updated it with Bernard's 
> modifications. I kept
> >> > ia64 and the
> >> > Intel(R) SR870BH2 tags out of the title.
> >> >       I don't known about the consistency of this README
> >> and the docs,
> >> > so I won't commit those changes to the branch and am sending it 
> >> > attached (as it'is a small txt).
> >> >       Cheers,
> >> >              Fernando
> >> >
> >> > Bernard Li a �crit :
> >> >> This README is getting more and more generic - perhaps we
> >> should take
> >> >> out .ia64 and the Intel(R) SR870BH2 tag?
> >> >>
> >> >> Also, shouldn't this README be kept consistent with the
> >> documentation?
> >> >>
> >> >> Cheers,
> >> >>
> >> >> Bernard
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >> >>> From: Lombard, David N [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:
> >> >>> Tuesday, December 14, 2004 9:45
> >> >>> To: Bernard Li; OSCAR-DEVEL
> >> >>> Subject: RE: [Oscar-devel] README.RHAS3.iA64 (final) and elilo 
> >> >>> problems
> >> >>>
> >> >>> From: Bernard Li;  Monday, December 13, 2004 3:57 PM
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> Hey Fernando:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Looks good, I just got 2 questions:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> 1) mysql-server
> >> >>>>  ------------
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> You will need to obtain a mysql-server rpm and put it into
> >> >>>
> >> >>> /tftpboot/rpm
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> before starting the OSCAR Wizard. The easiest way is 
> to get the 
> >> >>>> SRPM
> >> >>>
> >> >>> and
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> rebuild,
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>   rpmbuild --rebuild mysql-3.23.58-1.src.rpm
> >> >>>>   cp /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/ia64/mysql-server-3.23.58-1.ia64.rpm
> >> >>>> /tftpboot/rpm
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> If you can't get that SRPM, make sure you also save the
> >> other RPMS,
> >> >>>
> >> >>> e.g.,
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>   rpmbuild --rebuild mysql-3.23.58-2.3.src.rpm
> >> >>>>   cp /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/ia64/mysql*-3.23.58-1.ia64.rpm
> >> >>>
> >> >>> /tftpboot/rpm
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> - I am not sure what you mean in the second part...  how come 
> >> >>>> the
> >> >>>
> >> >>> src.rpm
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> file versions are different?  Are you saying that the 
> top one is 
> >> >>>> the recommended version and if you can't find that
> >> specific version
> >> >>>> make
> >> >>>
> >> >>> sure
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> that the other support RPM files are included in
> >> >>>
> >> >>> /tftpboot/rpm as well?
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> But how come the version #s are different in the second part
> >> >>>
> >> >>> (3.23.58-2.3
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> first line vs 3.23.58-1 second line).
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I wrote that bit.  So, the version provided by RH is
> >> 3.23.58-1.  If
> >> >>> you go the Internet, you might find, say, 3.23.58-2.3.
> >> This is fine
> >> >>> if and only if you also build the other mysql rpms.  
> That is, you 
> >> >>> can't mix the mysql-3.23.58-1.arch.rpm w/
> >> mysql-server-3.23.58-2.3.arch.rpm.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> So, should the second sentence say:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>  If you can't get the 3.23.58-1 source rpm, you must save
> >> all the
> >> >>> RPMs when you build the mysql-server, that is, all mysql
> >> versions
> >> >>> must be consistent.  For example, you could do
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Is this better?  If not, can you suggest some changes?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> --
> >> >>> David N. Lombard
> >> >>>
> >> >>> My comments represent my opinions, not those of Intel 
> Corporation.
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> -------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read
> >> honest & candid
> >> >> reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> >> >> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start
> >> reading now.
> >> >> http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> Oscar-devel mailing list
> >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Fernando Laudares Camargos
> >> >
> >> >      R�volution Linux    http://www.revolutionlinux.com
> >> > ---------------------------------------
> >> > * Tout opinion et prise de position exprim�e dans ce
> >> message est celle
> >> > de son auteur et pas n�cessairement celle de R�volution Linux.
> >> > ** Any views and opinion presented in this e-mail are
> >> solely those of
> >> > the author and do not necessarily represent those of
> >> R�volution Linux.
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >-------------------------------------------------------
> >SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid 
> >reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> >Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> >http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
> >_______________________________________________
> >Oscar-devel mailing list
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel
> 


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Oscar-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel

Reply via email to