Actually, I just looked at this and noticed at least some of the OSCAR
packages don't have any references to current RHEL or FC2. So, this has
pointed up some interesting discrepancies in
packages/oda/config.xml
packages/oda/scripts/post_client_rpm_uninstall
packages/oda/scripts/post_server_rpm_uninstall
packages/perl-Qt/scripts/post_server_rpm_uninstall
--
David N. Lombard
My comments represent my opinions, not those of Intel Corporation.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:oscar-devel-
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of SourceForge.net
>Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 11:05 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [Oscar-devel] [ oscar-Bugs-1080544 ] remove RHAS distro type
>
>Bugs item #1080544, was opened at 2004-12-07 06:18
>Message generated for change (Comment added) made by muglerj
>You can respond by visiting:
>https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=109368&aid=1080544&gr
oup_
>id=9368
>
>Category: None
>Group: 4.1
>Status: Open
>Resolution: None
>Priority: 5
>Submitted By: Erich Focht (efocht)
>>Assigned to: Bernard Li (bernardli)
>Summary: remove RHAS distro type
>
>Initial Comment:
>.. filing this as bug upon request of Jeff Squires:
>
>the RHAS distro type defined in lib/OSCAR/Distro.pm and
>showing up in several config.xml files is misleading! I am
>quite sure it is some leftover from a past attempt to support
>RHAS-2.1. I guess RHAS-2.1 won't be supported any more,
>am I right?
>
>The package name of redhat-release-3AS-NNN in RHEL3 is
>redhat-release and not redhat-release-as. The version number
>is 3AS! All the rhas entries are confusing and IMO should be
>deleted.
>
>Regards,
>Erich
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>>Comment By: John (muglerj)
>Date: 2005-01-25 14:04
>
>Message:
>Logged In: YES
>user_id=505737
>
>Assigning to Bernard as per his request.
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Comment By: John (muglerj)
>Date: 2005-01-25 14:02
>
>Message:
>Logged In: YES
>user_id=505737
>
>Could the RHEL people take a look at this? Dave?
>
>I do not understand this bug, moving to 4.1.
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>You can respond by visiting:
>https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=109368&aid=1080544&gr
oup_
>id=9368
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
>Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
>by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
>Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
>_______________________________________________
>Oscar-devel mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
_______________________________________________
Oscar-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel
