Yes, this is very definitely done on purpose. It's how one package tells switcher that it wants to be in the switcher configuration (i.e., it has a switcher module file). There's an ODA shortcut that Neil created for me that does a search on these things -- I use it to create the switcher configurator screen.OK, I have no doubt that this has a purpose. My question is: coudn't he had chosed another word than "package" for that? I mean, it would have made any difference for the ODA's shortcut?
More specifically, any package can put a <switcher> block inside their <package> block (with an appropriate <tag> and <name>) and switcher will "see" that when it is building its configurator page.
-- Fernando Laudares Camargos
R�volution Linux
http://www.revolutionlinux.com
---------------------------------------
* Tout opinion et prise de position exprim�e dans ce message est celle de son auteur et pas n�cessairement celle de R�volution Linux.
** Any views and opinion presented in this e-mail are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of R�volution Linux.
------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click _______________________________________________ Oscar-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel
