Bugs item #630103, was opened at 2002-10-28 15:49
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by muglerj
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=109368&aid=630103&group_id=9368

Category: Installation
>Group: 4.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 6
Submitted By: Thomas Naughton (naughtont)
Assigned to: Bernard Li (bernardli)
Summary: 'del node' updates "dhcpd.conf"

Initial Comment:
When using 'delete node' to remove a node from the cluster
this change should be made in the '/etc/dhcpd.conf' file.

Otherwise adding a node with a new name but the same 
NIC (i.e. MAC address) would cause problems.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: John (muglerj)
Date: 2005-02-22 14:56

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=505737

Moving to 4.2.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Bernard Li (bernardli)
Date: 2005-02-16 17:06

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=879102

dhcpd.conf should still be updated after 'delete node' is
run - fix is probably just to execute the mkdhcpd.conf
script when you delete node.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Date: 2005-02-16 17:02

Message:
Logged In: NO 

If the 'add node' always overwrites "dhcpd.conf" and does
not take into account anything it contains (ie. doesn't do
an update) then I guess it is safe to leave 'del node'.

It seems bad to depend on the add to keep the deletion of
data consistent.  However, if they both use the same data
source (i.e., SIS DB or OSCAR DB) then it's less of an issue.

my $0.02, --tjn

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Bernard Li (bernardli)
Date: 2005-02-15 20:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=879102

I just tested this with SVN trunk + Fedora Core 2.

dhcpd.conf gets overwritten when you add a new node (a new
dhcpd.conf is generated), so I don't see this as a problem
-- Thomas, can you confirm this?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: John (muglerj)
Date: 2005-02-15 13:19

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=505737

Ok, Bernard is going to test it. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: John (muglerj)
Date: 2005-02-15 13:17

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=505737

I assume this is still a problem, but can someone verify this?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Thomas Naughton (naughtont)
Date: 2004-11-01 16:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=288102

Punt to after sc'04 release.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jason Brechin (brechin)
Date: 2004-07-13 12:48

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=274641

Unassigning this from me since I'm no longer actively 
maintaining this code.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jason Brechin (brechin)
Date: 2003-12-04 13:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=274641

This has become complicated due to multicast.  The multicast 
selection is not stored anywhere, and thus will be reset to 
not multicast whenever dhcpd.conf is rebuilt.  We need to 
store the multicast selection and display that in the Setup 
Networking step (instead of always starting cleared), and 
then we can rebuild dhcpd.conf after deleting nodes using 
the same function that the Setup Networking window uses.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=109368&aid=630103&group_id=9368


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Oscar-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel

Reply via email to