Title: Re: [Oscar-devel] FW: [Oscar-users] ntp

I don’t recall the FAILED flag being related to sync.

 

--

David N. Lombard

 

My comments represent my opinions, not those of Intel Corporation.


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bernard Li
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 12:24 AM
To: gareth; oscar-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Oscar-devel] FW: [Oscar-users] ntp

 

Hey Gareth:

 

This is not necessarily a problem - some times it takes a while before the clients will be able to properly sync with the time server on the headnode...

 

What's the output of 'ntpq -p' on the slave node and on the headnode?

 

Did you check this after the cluster has just been built or has it been running for a while?

 

Cheers,

 

Bernard

 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of gareth
Sent: Thu 17/03/2005 11:57 PM
To: oscar-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Oscar-devel] FW: [Oscar-users] ntp

yo

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# /etc/init.d/ntpd start
ntpd: Synchronizing with time server:                      [FAILED]
Starting ntpd:                                             [  OK  ]

/etc/ntp.conf attached

On Thu 2005-03-17 (10:13), Bernard Li wrote:
> Hey Gareth:
>
> Can you post the /etc/ntp.conf on node1?  Also, please also post the
> error message when you run /etc/init.d/ntpd start on that node.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bernard
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of gareth
> > Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 1:55
> > To: oscar-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: [Oscar-users] ntp
> >
> > 4.1 branch, revision 2995
> >
> > On Thu 2005-03-17 (01:26), Bernard Li wrote:
> > >    Which version of OSCAR are you running?
> > >
> > >    Cheers,
> > >
> > >    Bernard
> > >     
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > >
> > >    From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of gareth
> > >    Sent: Thu 17/03/2005 1:09 AM
> > >    To: oscar-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > >    Subject: [Oscar-users] ntp
> > >
> > >    hey, it seems that ntp on the nodes isn't working.
> > starting up ntpd
> > >    fails. also:
> > >    [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# /etc/init.d/ntpd stop
> > >    Shutting down ntpd:                                     
> >   [  OK  ]
> > >    [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ntpdate oscar_server
> > >    17 Mar 10:56:03 ntpdate[2526]: no server suitable for
> > synchronization
> > >    found
> > >    even tho oscar_server is correctly pointing to the head node
> > >    (dvxgar001), on which:
> > >    [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# lsof -i | grep ntp
> > >    ntpd      3558     ntp    4u  IPv4  39918       UDP *:ntp
> > >    ntpd      3558     ntp    5u  IPv4  39919       UDP
> > >    dvxgar001.stu.uct.ac.za:ntp
> > >    ntpd      3558     ntp    6u  IPv4  39920       UDP
> > >    dvxgar001.stu.uct.ac.za:ntp
> > >    ntpd      3558     ntp    7u  IPv4  39921       UDP
> > >    localhost.localdomain:ntp
> > >    & the head node is correctly syncing with the external source
> > >    also out've interest the awesome instructions give an
> > nfs restriction
> > >    example
> > >    under tcp wrappers:
> > >    /etc/hosts.deny:
> > >    ALL: ALL
> > >    /etc/hosts.allow:
> > >    portmap:    .domain.net
> > >    rpc.mountd: .domain.net
> > >    sshd:       ALL
> > >    which doesn't work (nodes can't mount /home), even when
> > i change my
> > >    domain
> > >    to 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0
> > >    when i change /etc/hosts.allow to:
> > >    ALL:    192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0
> > >    sshd:   ALL
> > >    it works
> > >    -------------------------------------------------------
> > >    SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> > >    Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real
> > >    users.
> > >    Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start
> > reading now.
> > >    [1]http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> > >    _______________________________________________
> > >    Oscar-users mailing list
> > >    Oscar-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > >    [2]https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-users
> > >
> > > References
> > >
> > >    1. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> > >    2. https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-users
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest &
> > candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> > _______________________________________________
> > Oscar-users mailing list
> > Oscar-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-users
> >
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Oscar-devel mailing list
> Oscar-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel

Reply via email to