Well, I have a little different situation.
To me, FC3-X86 seems to work pretty well with trunk but I have
encountered the same thing at Step 8 as Raju has.
I have never run "scripts/repo-update" and have never run "yum update"
on my FC3.
RM_Detect messages only showed up when I re-test oscar after "start_over".
So I could get all the tests passed at the first installation on the
fresh FC3.
I have no idea why it happens but I just want to let you know when this
happens.
This is the test result at the first installation.
Performing root tests...
TORQUE node check [PASSED]
TORQUE service check:pbs_server [PASSED]
Maui service check:maui [PASSED]
/home mounts [PASSED]
Preparing user tests...
Performing user tests...
SSH ping test [PASSED]
SSH server->node [PASSED]
SSH node->server [PASSED]
PVM (via TORQUE) [PASSED]
Ganglia setup test [PASSED]
Ganglia node count test [PASSED]
TORQUE default queue definition [PASSED]
TORQUE Shell Test [PASSED]
LAM/MPI (via TORQUE) [PASSED]
Open MPI (via TORQUE) [PASSED]
MPICH (via TORQUE) [PASSED]
Run APItests...
Running Installation tests for pvm
/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py:398:
FutureWarning: hex()/oct() of negative int will return a signed string
in Python 2.4 and up
return "<%s at %s>" % (cname, hex(id(self)))
[PASS] 2006-05-24 01:38:02 pvmd-path-ls.apt
[PASS] 2006-05-24 01:38:02 envvar-pvm_arch.apt
[PASS] 2006-05-24 01:38:03 envvar-pvm_root.apt
[PASS] 2006-05-24 01:38:03 envvar.apb
[PASS] 2006-05-24 01:38:03 pvmd-path-which.apt
[PASS] 2006-05-24 01:38:03 modulecmd-path-ls.apt
[PASS] 2006-05-24 01:38:03 pvm-module-list.apt
[PASS] 2006-05-24 01:38:03 pvm-module-show-pvm_rsh.apt
[PASS] 2006-05-24 01:38:03 pvm-module-show-pvm_arch.apt
[PASS] 2006-05-24 01:38:03 pvm-module-show-pvm_root.apt
[PASS] 2006-05-24 01:38:03 pvm-module-show.apb
[PASS] 2006-05-24 01:38:03 pvm-module.apb
[PASS] 2006-05-24 01:38:03 install_tests.apb
...Hit <ENTER> key to exit...
Regards,
- DongInn
Erich Focht wrote:
On Tuesday 23 May 2006 22:48, Bernard Li wrote:
Looks like you're missing some module/switcher RPMs.
DongInn, is support on Fedora Core 3 x86 complete?
To my knowledge FC3 doesn't work well if one uses the original (old) distro.
Using scripts/repo-update to update the /tftpboot/distro/fedora-3-i386
repository, then updating the head node and only then starting with the
install improved solved a lot of problems for me. Head node distro and the
distro repository must be in sync!
Anyway the problem described by Raju looks like it could be something else...
Regards,
Erich
-------------------------------------------------------
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in
the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Oscar-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel
-------------------------------------------------------
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in
the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Oscar-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel
