From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Bernard Li
Sent: Sat 24/06/2006 17:46
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Oscar-devel] RFC: UYOK option in "Setup Networking"?
From: Erich Focht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 21/06/2006 01:35
To: [email protected]
Cc: Bernard Li
Subject: Re: [Oscar-devel] RFC: UYOK option in "Setup Networking"?
Hi,
a related issue: since we now support multiple
architectures and distros, we
actually can deploy any arch from the master
node. SystemInstaller is halfways
prepared for that as it chooses what file
to deliver first (pxelinux.0 or
elilo.efi) depending on the architecture.
What we don't do yet is delivering
an arch dependent pxe-config file (called
default right now), which selects
the kernel appropriate for the actual
architecture.
My workaround was to use netbootmgr and create the
appropriate links, having
install-kernel-i386
install-initrd-i386.img
install-kernel-x86_64
install-initrd-x86_64.img
install-kernel-ia64
install-initrd-ia64.img
With UYOK we get an additional variable into the
game: the distribution from
which the own kernel emerged. So please consider
some naming scheme for the
UYOK output which can coexist with other
architectures/distros, and maybe
create a symlink to "kernel" and
"initrd.img" for the master's arch.
Regards,
Erich
On
Tuesday 20 June 2006 22:18, Bernard Li wrote:
> Mike:
>
> UYOK
uses the kernel which the Linux distribution provides, so it's not
>
really a "custom kernel".
>
> Basically instead of using the
standard boot kernel/initrd.img which
> comes with SystemImager, it takes
the running kernel of the image server
> and generate a initrd.img that
works with SystemImager based on the
> intird_template for that
architecture.
>
> Just thought I'd clarify this.
>
>
Cheers,
>
> Bernard
>
> > -----Original
Message-----
> > From: Michael Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 12:41
> > To: Bernard Li
> > Cc:
[email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [Oscar-devel] RFC:
UYOK option in "Setup Networking"?
> >
> > Yes, please, I
think this is critically needed for many users. Custom
> >
kernels seem to be the norm in cluster computing, not the exception,
>
> and making people drop out of oscar to deal with them seems silly.
>
>
> > On 6/20/06, Bernard Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I would like to add a new radio button in "Setup
> >
Networking" to enable
> > > UYOK.
> > >
> >
> For those of you who don't know what UYOK is, you can read about it
>
> > here:
> > >
> > > http://svn.oscar.openclustergroup.org/trac/oscar/wiki/SystemImager
>
> >
> > > Basically if that button is enabled, then a UYOK
enabled
> > kernel/ramdisk
> > > will generated on the
headnode and when the "setup network
> > boot" button
> > >
is pressed, this kernel/ramdisk will be copied to /tftpboot
> > as
opposed
> > > to the standard one which ships with
SystemImager.
> > >
> > > This will also update
/tftpboot/pxelinux.cfg/default's
> > append line with
> > >
an appropriate ramdisk_size.
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
This won't be enabled by default, but would be
> > an easy
point
> > > & click way for users to make use of UYOK.
>
> >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > >
Bernard
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________ Oscar-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel
