I did not conduct careful testing, I just recall using it to uninstall and reinstall a package in the process of trying to get torque to work. I think I started over, and I don't know if it did what it was supposed to, but I think it "succeeded". I recall being surprised.
But I thought there was some last minute work on it around release time and that we had not disabled the menu buttons because it was at least nominally working, if quite untested. On 5/30/07, Bernard Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Mike: > > I wasn't aware that PackageInUn is working for 5.0 (or trunk, for that > matter). > > Did you try both install and uninstall? > > The code hasn't been touched for 4 months in trunk, and 1 year in branch-5.0: > > http://svn.oscar.openclustergroup.org/trac/oscar/log/trunk/lib/OSCAR/PackageInUn.pm > http://svn.oscar.openclustergroup.org/trac/oscar/log/branches/branch-5-0/lib/OSCAR/PackageInUn.pm > > Cheers, > > Bernard > > On 5/29/07, Michael Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > PackageInUn works in 5.0, at least I have used it and it gives the > > appearance of working... > > > > On 5/29/07, Geoffroy Vallée <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I am not sure that OPKGC and PackageInUn address the same problems: > > > PackageInUn makes the interface between the database and the underlying > > > binary package management system (yum, apt, or whatever else). So i think > > > PackageInUn will be simplified when we will use binary packages, but i do > > > not > > > think OPKGC will "replace" PackageInUn. > > > > > > Unfortunately I do not have the time right now to give more details about > > > that, i am kind of overbooked. But the PackageInUn specification (which is > > > not implemented) is online, feel free to have a look and give comments: > > > https://svn.oscar.openclustergroup.org/trac/oscar/wiki/PackageInUn > > > > > > Moreover, if i am not clear, let me know i will try to answer in few days. > > > Last point: since the PackageInUn code is currently broken, i think this > > > is > > > fine if we remove it from the GUI. > > > > > > My 2 cents, > > > > > > Le mardi 29 mai 2007 14:58, Kim, DongInn a écrit: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I am wondering if we are dropping the User Friendly interface(GUI) for > > > > implementing "Package Install/Uninstall" (in short, PackageInUn) feature > > > > at oscar_wizard when opkgc is fully imported to the oscar installation. > > > > http://oscar.openclustergroup.org/comp_opkgc > > > > (FYI, we are not losing the feature of installing/uninstalling packages > > > > and I believe that opkgc can take care of this.) > > > > > > > > PackageInUn was implemented in oscar_wizard (install/manage mode) until > > > > oscar 4.2 and it has been one of OSCAR main functionalities that I like > > > > to use to maintain my OSCAR cluster. > > > > > > > > But looks like that we have not planned to make any GUI to implement the > > > > previous PackageInUn stuff on OSCAR 5.1 yet. > > > > > > > > The features that the previous PackageInUn can do are > > > > 1. Add new package(s) to the existing cluster > > > > 2. Remove/Uninstall some packages from the existing cluster > > > > 3. Update oscarimage according to the addition or removal of the > > > > packages. > > > > 4. Update the "Node_Package_Status" table in oda. > > > > 5. It was integrated with "Selector" (i.e., "Select OSCAR Packages..." > > > > menu at oscar_wizard (manage mode)) > > > > 6. GUI > > > > > > > > I do not really care about the GUI as long as opkgc (the new OSCAR > > > > package management tool) can handle the obvious and inevitable issues > > > > above but not all possibly. > > > > > > > > In addition, if we can not do this via opkgc until OSCAR5.1 or if it is > > > > not worth to make the similar PackageInUn via opkgc, I think we need to > > > > provide a full instruction/document of managing OSCAR packages in the > > > > similar way that PackageInUn could have done it. > > > > > > > > What do you guys think about this? > > > -- > > > Geoffroy > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > > > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take > > > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. > > > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Oscar-devel mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take > > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. > > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Oscar-devel mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > _______________________________________________ > Oscar-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Oscar-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel
