I'm very confused here... the search function on SF works. It works slowly, but it WORKS! I'm not against a mirror, because we can probably do a better job than SF (and get better speed), but we should all be clear that the SF search is NOT broken.
Jason On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Sean Dague wrote: > Having been frustrated with the lack of search on sourceforge, I've set up > an archive of oscar-users at Mail Archive > (http://www.mail-archive.com/oscar-users%40lists.sourceforge.net). It has a > nice htdig search engine on it. > > I imported messages from Oct 24, 2002 to present into the archive. If > someone has a unix mailbox containing messages prior to Oct 24, please let > me know. I've got a script which will import the messages properly. > > There are advantages and disadvantages to this archive vs. the sf archive, > but for those looking to search for past answers, this might make it a bit > easier. > > -Sean > > -- > _______________________________________________________________________ > > Sean Dague [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dague.net > > There is no silver bullet. Plus, werewolves make better neighbors than > zombies, and they tend to keep the vampire population down. > _______________________________________________________________________ > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Oscar-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-users
