On Friday 20 April 2007 01:23:42 pm Michael Edwards wrote:
> OSCAR is still set up to some degree with the old assumption that all your
> nodes are identical.  The way it does images is an artifact of this.
>
> The "overrides" directory structure already has some of this logic (ie
> dealing only with the parts of the image you want to be different), but it
> is currently used only per image.  I would think it wouldn't be insanely
> hard to have it check these files per node.

Frankly, although I have this kind of per-node settings scheme implemented in 
my system, I've actually never used it ;-). I found it too complicated to 
develop and manage.

> You could just change how the master script works by node too...  Depends
> on how static (or significant) the differences between the nodes are I
> guess.

I can see node<N>.sh scripts created in /var/lib/systemimager/scripts/ as 
symlinks to the master script in the same directory. My guess is if you make 
a copy of the master script instead and edit it that's what will be used to 
provision a particular node, correct? If so it would be more than enough for 
me for now.

--Ivan

> The ability of OSCAR to handle node-level differences certainly needs a lot
> of work, but this isn't a quick-fixable thing I don't think.
>
> The images aren't crazy big though, so unless you have more than 5 or so
> types of nodes I would say the current method is certainly not optimal, but
> isn't insane...
>
> Things like this are on the cosmic to do list, but I don't think it is on
> anyones plate yet.  It would certainly be a useful change if you wanted to
> work on it :)
>
> On 4/20/07, Ivan Adzhubey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thursday 19 April 2007 08:12:50 pm Michael Edwards wrote:
> > > If you make a new image ( by reruning the wizard and starting with step
> >
> > 4
> >
> > > and going on from there like you did the first time) only with a new
> >
> > disk
> >
> > > layout, you should be able to make some nodes with one image and some
> >
> > nodes
> >
> > > with the other, I think.
> >
> > Sure, but that's exactly what I was trying to avoid. Making a new image
> > every
> > time you just need a few slave configuration bits changed is a rather
> > huge waste of resources...
> >
> > BTW, my home-brewed cluster management system can do this. It stores
> > nodes'
> > image(s) and settings separately so you can easily set up single OS image
> > with as many different settings as you like. In fact, I suspect this can
> > be
> > done with OSCAR also, I just can't figure out how yet...
> >
> > --Ivan
> >
> > > On 4/19/07, Ivan Adzhubey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 19 April 2007 06:58:35 pm Michael Edwards wrote:
> > > > > See if this document is helpful, she installed oscar on top of an
> > > >
> > > > existing
> > > >
> > > > > windows cluster, preserving the windows cluster partitions.
> >
> > http://svn.oscar.openclustergroup.org/wiki/oscar:5.0:user_submissions:win
> >
> > > >do
> > > >
> > > > >ws_linux
> > > >
> > > > Thanks, Michael, this is a very useful document. Still, it seems this
> > > > installation is not possible since I have one (possibly, two)
> >
> > computer(s)
> >
> > > > with disk specifications different form all others. As far as my
> > > > understanding of the instructions, there is no way to have computers
> >
> > with
> >
> > > > several different disk layouts within the same OSCAR cluster.
> > > >
> > > > > On 4/19/07, Ivan Adzhubey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is there any way to tell OSCAR to install node image on the
> > > > > > second
> > > >
> > > > drive
> > > >
> > > > > > instead of the first one (and do not touch the first one at all)?
> >
> > I
> >
> > > > have
> > > >
> > > > > > a computer with 3Ware RAID controller and a 4-disk array
> > > > > > attached, for some reason Fedora Core 5 kernel recognizes it as
> > > > > > /dev/sda,
> >
> > while
> >
> > > > > > the built-in SATA controller attached disk is set as /dev/sdb. To
> > > >
> > > > complicate
> > > >
> > > > > > things, GRUB
> > > > > > seems to (correctly) enumerate SATA disk as (hd0).

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Oscar-users mailing list
Oscar-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-users

Reply via email to