Hello,

Here is some information:

1/ I do not see any problem here. What is the problem? As far as i know most 
packages still need testing with OSCAR 6.x so they are not yet in "Default".

2/ It is using online repositories, which is slower than local ones. Setup a 
local mirror for your RPM and everything will be faster. Again, nothing is 
wrong here.

3/ I see a couple of errors in your logs. I released 6.1.1 since, can you give 
it a try?

4/ The list is in /usr/share/oscar/oscarsamples/rhel-5-x86_64.rpmlist

Best regards,

----- ghot...@gmail.com a écrit :

> All,
> 
> I just put a fresh install of CENTOS 5.4 x86_64 on a head node and
> went through the installation and setup of OSCAR 6.1.1svn06022011 on
> the head node.
> 
> Several issues:
> 1) During the "Select OSCAR Packages To Install", I had to select
> "Experimental" to get most of the desired packages (TORQUE, MPI,
> etc.). "Default" only had the Core: base, c3, oda, sc3, sis, switcher,
> sync-files, and yum (ganglia, opium, and selinux were "Included", but
> not checked). What is the issue here?
> 
> 2) It was very, very slow to build the Client Image. What could be
> going wrong? (I have used previous versions of OSCAR and this build
> took probably 5 to 6 times longer.) We have a fast gigabit connection.
> Typical yum updates download with at least 1 MB/sec.
> 
> 3) The worst of it, the cluster deployment fails during the imaging of
> the compute nodes (with the "Have fun! http://systemimager.org "
> message). I tried UYOK and that imaging also failed.
> 
> I have two sets of compute nodes (one older set and one newer set).
> The hardware of the newer set of compute nodes is very similar to the
> hardware on the head node, except for the hard drives (RAID on head
> node, one drive SAS on compute nodes). I might have expected some
> issues with the slightly older hardware, but not with the newer
> hardware (that is very similar to head node).
> 
> I have previously set up these two sets of hardware with older
> versions of OSCAR (the older hardware with OSCAR 4.2 and the newer
> with OSCAR 5.1rc), but I wanted to unify them under one head node with
> the new version of OSCAR. I don't want to resort to going back to try
> OSCAR 5.1rc, but I might have to do so.
> 
> Any advice on getting this to work? It has probably some simple fix.
> If you want the log file, a slightly trimmed version is at
> http://pastebin.com/KvfqY0ww
> 
> 4) What is the bare-bones list of RPMs to get OSCAR 6.1.1 and CENTOS
> 5.4 to work on compute nodes.
> 
> 
> Thank you in advance for the help.
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Simplify data backup and recovery for your virtual environment with
> vRanger.
> Installation's a snap, and flexible recovery options mean your data is
> safe,
> secure and there when you need it. Discover what all the cheering's
> about.
> Get your free trial download today. 
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-dev2dev2 
> _______________________________________________
> Oscar-users mailing list
> Oscar-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-users

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Simplify data backup and recovery for your virtual environment with vRanger.
Installation's a snap, and flexible recovery options mean your data is safe,
secure and there when you need it. Discover what all the cheering's about.
Get your free trial download today. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-dev2dev2 
_______________________________________________
Oscar-users mailing list
Oscar-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-users

Reply via email to