Re: [osflash] Introducing Ripple

Tue, 05 Jul 2005 06:01:37 -0700

Correct me if I'm wrong Peter (I know you love too), but you create an XHTML website.  If you want, you utilize Ripple to display that website in Flash.  Naturally, it helps to design said site simply to ease the markup parsing Ripple has to make it easier to get at in Flash.
 
Peter's technique is the recommended way Google suggests you take to index Flash content, quoted from the Google team's response to an email asking:
 
"The practice of creating HTML copies of these Flash pages for our
crawler is actually our recommended solutions to this kind of issue."
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 6:58 AM
Subject: RE: [osflash] Introducing Ripple

Claus’s SEFFS solution and Peter’s Ripple framework are something inverted to each other. Because Claus proposes first to create the XHTML version of site and then to render it to Flash state using SEFFS. Peter’s goes from opposite side, proposing first to create flash and then it’s “XHTML-mirror” then, right?

Rost

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Hansen
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 11:48 AM
To: Peter Hall; Open Source Flash Mailing List
Subject: Re: [osflash] Introducing Ripple

 

Hi,

Ripple is a Claus Wahlers' use of sIFR to do a similar thing.Google did index his test site, but who knows if the ranking wadelicious idea, but what is the probability that the search engines, e.g. google, will penalized my site for using this technique (i.e. for cloaking)?

I've looked at s affected?

Any comments on this 'issue' ?


Cheers

   -michael

_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org

Reply via email to