Hi Carlo,

here is a proposal for the new corner "Closed Source Flash Tools" (that
I dont find from the mainpage anymore)
http://www.osflash.org/doku.php?id=closed_source_flash_tools.
It is a very power- and helpfull flashout-alternative (and some months
older).


The OSFlash policy on this pretty clear: If there is an open-source alternative, there's really no need to list a closed-source alternative. OSFlash is a resource for *open source* Flash. There are many other resource sites that list free and commercial Flash-related products. If your product is a Flashout alternative, since there is currently no open-source Flashout alternative (that I am aware of -- keep in mind I just got back from two weeks of vacation) I don't see why you shouldn't add this tool to the closed source flash tools page. However, from the features listed, it doesn't appear to be a Flashout alternative but rather an alternative logging tool. If this is the case, then I don't see why it should be listed on the site as there are already open-source alternatives.

So, I guess it's up to you to answer your own question based on what your tool does :)

All the best,
Aral

Carlo Blatz wrote:

Hey OS-Flashers,

here is a proposal for the new corner "Closed Source Flash Tools" (that
I dont find from the mainpage anymore)
http://www.osflash.org/doku.php?id=closed_source_flash_tools.
It is a very power- and helpfull flashout-alternative (and some months
older). For all future FDT users it will be special good to know it...
(more FDT-news this week)
<snip>



_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org

Reply via email to