Hi Scott, Scott Hyndman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >The best approach would be an open-sourced object model and comms layer, so >that we could build Eclipse and standalone UIs. Not everybody wants to use >Eclipse, but everyone has use for something like this. I don't think >anybody even wants to open the Flash IDE if they can help it, so how about >we cut that option right now.
I think that is right. It should be able to tie into any editor. So we will have to create an API for the other languages to use. >And you shouldn't only be asking Nicolas, you should be asking everyone. >This is our world, so we should shape our tools as we all see fit. I was thinking that everyone would reply anyway. I was indeed replying to Nicolas, but really asking for everyone's opinion. If I hadn't wanted other people's opinions I would have replied directly to Nicolas. Sorry that it was not clear. >I can't believe no one is jumping on this. ASDT guys, where are you? This >is huge! >Do you guys actually think you don't need this, or is it that no one is >willing to take it on? Oh, I want to work on this. Having a decent Debugger would save all of us quite a bit of time developing SWF applications. I was just taking the weekend off for a change. I'm sure that's true for a lot of us. ;-) I'm going to work with John Grden to get this working with the AdminTool. As Nicolas pointed out, there will need to be a socket layer that is not done in Flash, so it doesn't necessarily fit with the way the admin tool works now. As the AT currently uses a LocalConnection, perhaps the socket layer can send to Flash using this protocol. We can derive that information from this: http://osflash.org/doku.php?id=localconnection&s=LocalConnection Anyway, these are just preliminary ideas, and any other ideas from anyone are greatly appreciated. -Chris _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
