Me too Boris, I use and appreciate ASDT!!!

On 9/23/05, Michael Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Boris,
>
> ASDT is still very much appreciated by the many of us who is not eligible
> for a free FDT license, and don't wanna shell of the €200 or what ever. U
> guys are doing great work. Also, great to hear that you are looking into
> ANTLR - it just keeps getting better.
>
> Cheers,
>
>   -michael
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 9/23/05, hank williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, I am working full time on a (hopefully) soon to be released
> > product (actually service) but this is an area of great interest to
> > me. ANTLR seems very interesting based on the homepage, so I am
> > downloading it now. I will definitely throw some spare cyles at this.
> >
> > Regards
> > Hank
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 9/23/05, Martin Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > well hank, im sure youre more than welcome to join ASDT :)
> > >
> > > this is exactly the issues that are being looked into at the moment.
> > >
> > > We are looking at using ANTLR as the parser generator
> > >
> > > http://www.antlr.org/
> > >
> > > which i think will provide us with a solid foundation for generating a
> > > parser, which can then give us the AST (abstract syntax tree), and of
> > > course a complete compiler if needed. :)
> > >
> > > Martin has made a start on the grammar (there is already a basic setup
> > > for ECMA-script available in antrl format) but we would dearly love more
> > > help.
> > >
> > > On a more general note, of course ASDT must 'compete' with FDT and Zorn,
> > > and i think it will do within time. Hopefully that time will be sooner
> > > rather than later.
> > > So, if anyone wants to make ASDT the tool you want it to be, help out in
> > > any way you can. Report bugs, desired features, workflow improvements,
> > > write documentation, just contribute brain power. Its not all about the
> > > coding :)
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > >
> > > hank williams wrote:
> > > > Boris,
> > > >
> > > > Your posting raises some interesting questions.
> > > >
> > > > It seems to me that ASDT must compete with FDT and ultimately Zorn.
> > > >
> > > > In order to do that, the primary issue is developing an actionscript
> > > > parser that explores whole files and generates errors for an entire
> > > > file at a time (instead of one at a time)... quickly. This is
> > > > necessary so that the editor can show where all the errors are during
> > > > the edit cycle as does java eclipse, FDT, and presumably Zorn.
> > > >
> > > > I have not looked at the MTASC source becuase I initially failed at
> > > > getting OCAML setup (and I got lazy). But Nicolas has said that it
> > > > would be very hard to get MTASC to do this, as opposed to generating
> > > > only one error at a time. Nevertheless, it seems to me that this is a
> > > > critical missing piece in the Actionscript open source universe. Such
> > > > a codebase would be an anchor to any open source editor. The thing is,
> > > > this should be much easier than acutually doing a full MTASC since no
> > > > code generation is necessary, only parsing.
> > > >
> > > > Is ther a formal syntax BNF/LALR for a parser generator to generate
> > > > actionscript? It seems to me that someone (Nicolas perhaps) must have
> > > > done this work already? I was thinking, maybe since we are working in
> > > > eclipse, which is a java environment, it might be possible to take
> > > > Jack (the java version of Yacc) and create a grammar for actionscript,
> > > > so that anyone could create an actionscript compiler. There is no
> > > > reason that we shouldnt have full computer sciencey language tools
> > > > around Action/ECMA script.
> > > >
> > > > I have been thinking about this for a few weeks and I would love to
> > > > get a language tools discussion going regarding solid open source
> > > > Actionscript language building components so that we can make a full
> > > > suite of Actionscript language development tools in the way that such
> > > > things exist for other languages.
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > Hank
> > > >
> > > > On 9/23/05, Boris BEAULANT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>Hi,
> > > >>
> > > >>I know FDT is a good product, I know FDT represent a lot of work, But
> I
> > > >>know that FDT isn't Open Source !
> > > >>And in this case it couldn't be an awesome gesture but a commercial
> > > >>gesture ... ;(
> > > >>
> > > >>I know ASDT isn't enough strong and complete face to FDT, but we work
> on
> > > >>it. I'm sorry for this Nico, I know all what you did for ASDT and
> that's
> > > >>why all this hurt me !
> > > >>
> > > >>Else ASDT work only on motivation of its team ... *if all OS flash
> > > >>developpers doesn't support an OS tool who will do it ?*
> > > >>
> > > >>If I'm wrong, please explain me !
> > > >>
> > > >>Bo (an angry guy behind his computer)
> > > >> http://asdt.org
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>Thomas Wester wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>Thanks Nico. This is an awesome gesture.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>-Thomas
> > >
> >>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>>*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Nico Zimmermann
> > > >>>*Sent:* Thursday, September 22, 2005 9:54 AM
> > > >>>*To:* Open Source Flash Mailing List
> > > >>>*Subject:* AW: [osflash] FDT license
> > > >>>
> > > >>>Hey All!
> > > >>>
> > > >>>I am at low batterie status so I make it short.
> > > >>>All known OSFlashers should have received their keys now.
> > > >>>If there is any trouble or someone forgotten please mail
> > > >>>at [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>Conference was great. I was wondering how many people did not
> > > >>>know MTASC, SWFMill or even Eclipse... Maybe this
> > > >>>changed now(I think so).
> > > >>>
> > > >>>Looking forward to the conference in Amsterdam:)
> > > >>>
> > > >>>Sorry for the delay... hope you did not get in any trouble...
> > > >>>
> > > >>>Cheers, Nico
> > > >>>
> > > >>>Powerflasher GmbH | Tel: +49(0)241 91880-230
> > > >>>
> > > >>>>Drehturm <      | Fax: +49(0)241 91880-239
> > > >>>
> > > >>>Belvedereallee5   | Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >>>D-52070 Aachen    | http://www.powerflasher.de
> > > >>>< http://www.powerflasher.de/>
> > > >>>
> > >
> >>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>>*Von:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] im Auftrag von Edwin van Rijkom
> > > >>>*Gesendet:* Di 20.09.2005 22:21
> > > >>>*An:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Open Source Flash Mailing List
> > > >>>*Betreff:* Re: [osflash] FDT license
> > > >>>
> > > >>>That sounds good. Thanks a lot Lars!
> > > >>>
> > > >>>Cheers,
> > > >>>Edwin
> > > >>>
> > > >>>Lars Heinrich wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>>Ok.. I called Nico, he told me that he will contact you latest on
> > > >>>>monday. Because he´s on the roadshow he can´t do anything now.
> > > >>>>But after he´s back he will take a look on your request.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>Sorry it tooked us so long, there is no excuse for that... We are
> > > >>>>working on the problem ;-).
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>On 9/20/05, *Lars Heinrich* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >>>><mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>    Like Stefan told, Nico and Carlo are both on a roadshow across
> > > >>>>    germany. I will see what we can do for Edwin.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > >
> >>>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>_______________________________________________
> > > >>>>osflash mailing list
> > > >>>>[email protected]
> > > >>>>
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>_______________________________________________
> > > >>>osflash mailing list
> > > >>>[email protected]
> > > >>>
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> > > >>>
> > >
> >>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>>
> > > >>>_______________________________________________
> > > >>>osflash mailing list
> > > >>>[email protected]
> > > >>>
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >>_______________________________________________
> > > >>osflash mailing list
> > > >>[email protected]
> > >
> >>http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > osflash mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > >
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > want to know what i think? probably not
> > >
> > > http://relivethefuture.com/choronzon
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > osflash mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > osflash mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> osflash mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
>
>
>


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org

Reply via email to