Well, it will be a little pain in the neck with my external librairies creation, but I can only approve your approach :p You seem very knowledgeable on the fundamentals of languages :)
Thanks for your quick answers (Nicolas and folks) and for the good job ^^ Clement PS: Thanks for the correction Cedric 2005/9/26, Nicolas Cannasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Nicolas, was it a choice of yours to have this difference between > > MTasc and MMC or did it not appear intellectualy satisfying when you > > thought the grammar for MTasc ? I'd greatly appreciate your point of > > view on the question. > > Yes it was a choice. > MTASC parser is less strict than MMC one, but otoh the syntax is enforced by > only allowing expressions with "side effects". It is true that in functional > languages "1" is an expression, but in that case you might get a compilation > warning saying you're discarding a value (at least in OCaml). > > Nicolas > > _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
