Well, it will be a little pain in the neck with my external librairies
creation, but I can only approve your approach :p
You seem very knowledgeable on the fundamentals of languages :)

Thanks for your quick answers (Nicolas and folks) and for the good job ^^

Clement

PS: Thanks for the correction Cedric

2005/9/26, Nicolas Cannasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Nicolas, was it a choice of yours to have this difference between
> > MTasc and MMC or did it not appear intellectualy satisfying when you
> > thought the grammar for MTasc ? I'd greatly appreciate your point of
> > view on the question.
>
> Yes it was a choice.
> MTASC parser is less strict than MMC one, but otoh the syntax is enforced by
> only allowing expressions with "side effects". It is true that in functional
> languages "1" is an expression, but in that case you might get a compilation
> warning saying you're discarding a value (at least in OCaml).
>
> Nicolas
>
>

_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org

Reply via email to