Mike Chambers wrote: > The question / issue is not whether an open source compiler, or some > other open source project around Flash is good for the platform. The > issue is whether those projects are breaking EULAs, or other laws / > license agreements.
Of course Mike, you are right in what you say. I was not trying to weigh an open source compiler project against its legalities based solely on it's benefit to the platform. Rather I was merely trying to illustrate that the driving force behind such a project is not that different to the projects it was being compared to - legal issues aside. As far as the Wiki is concerned, the burden of legality should not be Aral's responsibility in this case, and so therefore the bytecode related documentation has since been removed. _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
