R5 have always been very open about what we are and are not doing. Up until now we have heard nothing telling us to stop. If MM have issues please speak up in a public forum and we will try to answer as best we can.
Also I fail to see how RTMP and AMF are any different. Other than the fact one is over a persistent socket and the other is over HTTP. R5 will be good for Macromedia if it does well. Basically an open source server people can use with Flex2. Well surely that's only good for Flex2. Its clear MM is going to make a lot of money from the Flex IDE and it looks like its going to be a big success.
MM have done a great job of supporting the open source flash movement so far, thanks a lot to your participation. The conference was a great success and the whole open source ecosystem is good for flash. You know its a good selling point for getting those Java/PHP/Ruby/.Net developers using flash. If you have issues please engage us in dialogue, not call in the lawyers. A legal stink will only be bad for the community as a whole and flash as a platform.
The future is open, I think we all know this deep down.
A company which tries to suppress open source is not going to lead the web.
Let products live and die on their technical merits.
-- Luke
On 10/26/05, Mike Chambers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why do you assume they have no issues?
mike chambers
Thomas Wester wrote:
> Thanks for the heads up Aral.
>
> However I fail to see a clear connection with the MTASC future
> discussion. The Red5 or amfphp projects have no issues with
> deconstruction the AMF protocol I can't see how deconstructing a f8.5
> .swf is any different.
>
_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
_______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
