Hi. My intent was not to spread any FUD. However, this is an important 
issue, and one which hasnt really been discussed.

One thing that I have personally seen over the past couple of months is 
people becoming more and more bolder about talking about reverse 
engineering protocols, tools, formats etc. This starts to get into 
sensitive areas.

At some point, the conversations / actions are going to go over the 
line, and Macromedia or some other company will have to respond. That is 
not something that I think that anyone wants.

The assumption in the OSFlash community seems to be that because we 
haven't done anything in the past, that ANYTHING is ok. You can see this 
in the all comments pointing to AMFPHP as justification that other 
projects are "ok". You can also see this in the comments on the 
Screenweaver blog:

--
In practice though, distribution of the player with swf2exe's has always 
be condoned.
--
(http://www.vanrijkom.org/archives/2005/08/licensed_to_fla.html)

i.e. because we haven't done anything in the past, people are assuming 
we will never do anything, regardless of what is going on.

mike chambers


_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org

Reply via email to