Adding to that, it was very easy for us to obtain permission to distribute the Flash Player with some of our Zinc apps. We asked MM if we can do it and they said yes.
Stefan > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Stefan Richter > Sent: 26 October 2005 16:32 > To: 'Open Source Flash Mailing List' > Subject: Re: [osflash] Sreenweaver : WAS Legal Considerations That > ConcernUs All > > Can't comment on Screenweaver but Zinc has the option of packaging the > plugin or relying on the one that's installed. > > Stefan > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On > > Behalf Of Mike Chambers > > Sent: 26 October 2005 16:15 > > To: Open Source Flash Mailing List > > Subject: [osflash] Sreenweaver : WAS Legal Considerations That Concern > Us > > All > > > > First of all, if you need input from Macromedia on something, then > > posting to a blog is not necessarily the best way to get it. For > > example, I had never seen the post below. > > > > Second, do Screenweaver projects actually embed the player? (sorry if > > that is a simple qustion, but I havent used Screenweaver). > > > > mike chambers > > > > > > > > Edwin van Rijkom wrote: > > > Stefan Richter wrote: > > > > > > > > >>It's up to Macromedia/Adobe to lay out the rules for the game. Having > > the > > >>referee play on one of the teams doesn't make much of a great sport > and > > >>leaves the other side wondering if it's worth playing at all. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > Playing the game will be very worthwhile if it turns out that the > > > referee realizes that his target is to make the sport more populair, > to > > > the benifit of all players and the audience. > > > > > > I wish he would erect the perimeter fence - I'm asking for that > > > explicitly (see: > > > http://www.vanrijkom.org/archives/2005/08/licensed_to_fla.html) but it > > > seems to be half-time. > > > > > > IMHO this could all be cleared up if someone for each 'disputable' > > > project would simply contact Macromedia formaly and ask if a license > is > > > required. If so, why not simply ask Macromedia if such a license can > be > > > granted? > > > > > > If the answer is 'no' than that would be very disapointing, but it is > > > better to know sooner than later. At least it would put an end to all > > > uncertainties. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Edwin > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > osflash mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > osflash mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > > > _______________________________________________ > osflash mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
