He didn't get a reply. I am following up on it internally now. mike chambers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Scott Hyndman wrote: > Did you get no reply from Macromedia, or were you rejected? > > Scott > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Edwin van Rijkom > Sent: Wed 10/26/2005 12:37 PM > To: Open Source Flash Mailing List > Cc: > Subject: Re: [osflash] Screenweaver : WAS Legal Considerations > That Concern Us All > Mike Chambers wrote: > > >First of all, if you need input from Macromedia on something, then > >posting to a blog is not necessarily the best way to get it. For > >example, I had never seen the post below. > > > > > I did not post on my blog to get a reaction from Macromedia. For that, I > filled out the 'player licensing' form, twice, unfortunately to no > avail. The blog is for personal opinion and keeping the community up to > speed on what's keeping me busy. > > >Second, do Screenweaver projects actually embed the player? (sorry if > >that is a simple qustion, but I havent used Screenweaver). > > > > > It's an option. Users can choose to pack the ActiveX with their projects > for easy deployment. All swf2exe's work that way nowadays. > > Cheers, > Edwin > > >mike chambers > > > > > > > >Edwin van Rijkom wrote: > > > > > >>Stefan Richter wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>>It's up to Macromedia/Adobe to lay out the rules for the game. > Having the > >>>referee play on one of the teams doesn't make much of a great sport and > >>>leaves the other side wondering if it's worth playing at all. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>Playing the game will be very worthwhile if it turns out that the > >>referee realizes that his target is to make the sport more populair, to > >>the benifit of all players and the audience. > >> > >>I wish he would erect the perimeter fence - I'm asking for that > >>explicitly (see: > >>http://www.vanrijkom.org/archives/2005/08/licensed_to_fla.html) but it > >>seems to be half-time. > >> > >>IMHO this could all be cleared up if someone for each 'disputable' > >>project would simply contact Macromedia formaly and ask if a license is > >>required. If so, why not simply ask Macromedia if such a license can be > >>granted? > >> > >>If the answer is 'no' than that would be very disapointing, but it is > >>better to know sooner than later. At least it would put an end to all > >>uncertainties. > >> > >>Cheers, > >>Edwin > >> > >> > >> > >>_______________________________________________ > >>osflash mailing list > >>[email protected] > >>http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > >> > >> > >> > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >osflash mailing list > >[email protected] > >http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > osflash mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > osflash mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
