Tim
On 11/26/05, quinrou . <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
cool thx for this.On 11/25/05, Nicolas Cannasse < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:quinrou . wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am really interested in using MTASC compiler for the reason that it
> compiles way faster than the flash ide however one thing is worrying as
> I read that once the project was developed with MTASC the flash ide
> won't be able to be used to compile the code. For instance if I develop
> the code with MTASC and pass on the project to someone else who doesn't
> use MTASCbut flash to compile the code - how portable will this be?
>
> I know you can't compile code develop with the flash ide with MTASC
> because of MTASC strict typing but i was wondering if it was possible
> the other way around?
>
> thx
> seb
There is always a way to have some code to compile on both MTASC and the
Flash IDE. There is very few syntax and type differences, so the best
way is to develop in MTASC and then when you need try to compile using
the IDE. It will sometimes need very few fixes, but it will work.
Nicolas
_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
--
---
Tim
timwalling.com
_______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
