One question.

What happened to the logo contest and where would/could that fit into
the current site? The kind of logo style was requested seems totally
different from the header. Is the header a placeholder or are the
contest entries and style no longer relevant?

Regards
Hank

On 12/5/05, John Grden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Personally, I'm not into the design by committee approach.  We already tried
> that, no one volunteered, then finally, someone did it.  Ultimately, you
> mean to please everyone, and in the end, you please no one and you're not
> happy with what's out there.
>
>  I think Aral's approach is right on track.  Sure, we might not agree on the
> header, but the site will morph and adapt.  the important part of it for me
> was the color changes and getting the message across of where we were
> mentally - open, fun, uninhibited.  I think I already said that
> somewhere...;)
>
>  Whites/blues/grays - great for what OS is and usually are colors that
> please.   I actually enjoy looking at the site again .  I really didn't like
> the other version.
>
>
> On 12/4/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Someone else had mentioned to have a competition to skin the website. I
> would
> > like to see that. If Aral is very busy this could be a way to help free
> his
> > time.
> >
> > On December 3, 2005 04:20 am, Aral Balkan wrote:
> > > Hi Ben,
> > >
> > > >1. It's busy as all hell.
> > > >2. It's illegible. Not just tough to read, but really illegible.
> > >
> > > You're right. Bearing in mind that it is meant to be temporary, I can't
> > > really devote too much time to it but take a look at the updated design.
> > > It should be far more legible :)
> > > http://osflash.org
> > >
> > > >3. Does this really fit the image that Aral wants for OSFlash? If that
> > > >image includes credibility and trust (two things that are definitely on
> > > >the top of any organization's priority list), then I think it's going
> > > >to detract from that.
> > >
> > > Credibility and trust are, of course, *very* important. But let's never
> > > forget the fun factor, lest we fool ourselves into thinking we're "grown
> > > ups" or other such mythical creatures as next we may find ourselves
> > > starting to wear ties and suits and acting in other such silly manners
> :)
> > >
> > > Although the wiki should be well-organized, easy to read and presented
> > > in a professional manner -- it is in essence an empty wall and you all
> > > have spray cans in your hands. It's important that the wiki is not seen
> > > as some holy scripture that cannot be altered by any but the Chosen Few.
> > > (In other words, I'd like there to be a welcome mat on the wiki for
> > > anyone with something to contribute to contribute it without feeling
> > > overwhelmed.)
> > >
> > > Your input, feedback, suggestions, etc. are invaluable and I thank you
> > > for not holding back or watering them down -- it shows that you really
> > > care and that's a wonderful thing! :)
> > >
> > > Take care,
> > > Aral
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > osflash mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > osflash mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> >
>
>
>
> --
> John Grden - Blitz
> _______________________________________________
> osflash mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org

Reply via email to